ორშაბათი, აპრილი 13, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Wormwood

Artemisia absinthium

Also known as: Wormwood herb extract, Artemisia absinthium extract, Absinth wormwood, Grand wormwood, Thujone herb

HIGH RISK 6.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 6.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Wormwood (Artemisia absinthium) contains thujone and absinthin with antiparasitic and digestive bitter properties. Thujone is a GABA-A receptor antagonist and neurotoxin at high doses — capable of causing seizures, hallucinations, and kidney damage. The EU limits thujone in food products to 10 mg/kg. Avoid prolonged use (>4 weeks). Do not use during pregnancy (uterotonic and abortifacient). Contraindicated in epilepsy, kidney or liver disease. Interactions with seizure threshold-lowering drugs. Only standardised, low-thujone extracts should be used supplementally.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Artemisia absinthium
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient Wormwood
Scientific name Artemisia absinthium
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Wormwood indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Wormwood
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Artemisia absinthium
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:09

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Artemisia absinthium attenuates hepatic fibrosis in mice by suppressing hepatic stellate cells activation and modulating inflammatory chemokine signaling. ↗
    Journal Cell Biochem Biophys
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Manzoor R et al.. Artemisia absinthium attenuates hepatic fibrosis in mice by suppressing hepatic stellate cells activation and modulating inflammatory chemokine signaling.. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2026. PMID:41849079.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Evaluation of Repellent Activity of an Artemisia absinthium L.-Based Topical Formulation Against Anopheles stephensi and Aedes aegypti. ↗
    Journal Altern Ther Health Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Shahabuddin F et al.. Evaluation of Repellent Activity of an Artemisia absinthium L.-Based Topical Formulation Against Anopheles stephensi and Aedes aegypti.. Altern Ther Health Med. 2026. PMID:41698022.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    In-silico evaluation of the efficacy of essential oils from Artemisia absinthium, Artemisia herba-alba, and Artemisia annua against SARS-CoV-2. ↗
    Journal Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bouzerea N et al.. In-silico evaluation of the efficacy of essential oils from Artemisia absinthium, Artemisia herba-alba, and Artemisia annua against SARS-CoV-2.. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2026. PMID:41684177.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Differential effects of biologically and chemically synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles on artemisinin biosynthesis gene expression in Artemisia absinthium. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mahjouri S et al.. Differential effects of biologically and chemically synthesized copper oxide nanoparticles on artemisinin biosynthesis gene expression in Artemisia absinthium.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41644687.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Natural Essential Oils as Promising Antimicrobial Agents to Improve Food Safety: Mechanistic Insights Against Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from… ↗
    Journal Foods
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gharbi M et al.. Natural Essential Oils as Promising Antimicrobial Agents to Improve Food Safety: Mechanistic Insights Against Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli Isolated from Tunisia.. Foods. 2026. PMID:41596906.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Bacteriostatic Effect of Some Plant Extracts Against Crown Gall Caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens L. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Jacek B et al.. Bacteriostatic Effect of Some Plant Extracts Against Crown Gall Caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens L.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41596362.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Alginate-Based Beads Containing Artemisia absinthium L. Extract as Innovative Ingredients for Baked Products. ↗
    Journal Gels
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Candiani A et al.. Alginate-Based Beads Containing Artemisia absinthium L. Extract as Innovative Ingredients for Baked Products.. Gels. 2026. PMID:41590070.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effect of herbal preparation Artemisia absinthium on honeybees infected with Nosema ceranae microsporidia under laboratory conditions. ↗
    Journal Open Vet J
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zinatullina ZY et al.. Effect of herbal preparation Artemisia absinthium on honeybees infected with Nosema ceranae microsporidia under laboratory conditions.. Open Vet J. 2025. PMID:41630729.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effectiveness of Repellent Plants for Controlling Potato Tuber Moth (Symmetrischema tangolias) in the Andean Highlands. ↗
    Journal Insects
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Villanueva A et al.. Effectiveness of Repellent Plants for Controlling Potato Tuber Moth (Symmetrischema tangolias) in the Andean Highlands.. Insects. 2025. PMID:41598878.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Data-Driven Optimization of Polyphenol Recovery and Antioxidant Capacity from Medicinal Herbs Using Chemometrics and HPLC Profiling for Functional Food Applications. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Athanasiadis V et al.. Data-Driven Optimization of Polyphenol Recovery and Antioxidant Capacity from Medicinal Herbs Using Chemometrics and HPLC Profiling for Functional Food Applications.. Int J Mol Sci. 2025. PMID:41516188.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 6.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 6.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Wormwood. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

HIGH RISK 6.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a high safety concern. Its use in dietary supplements is associated with documented adverse events.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
6.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the High classification for Wormwood

GIRI Score 6.5 / 10

A score of 6.5 places this ingredient in the High band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.