ორშაბათი, აპრილი 13, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Specialty

Wax Moth Larva Extract

Galleria mellonella

Also known as: Galleria mellonella extract, Ognevka tincture, Wax moth tincture, Greater wax moth larva

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Wax moth larva (Galleria mellonella) tincture is a traditional folk remedy popular in Russia/Eastern Europe, claimed to have immunomodulatory, adaptogenic, and antimycobacterial properties. It contains ceramidase, lipase, and protease enzymes, as well as fatty acids and amino acids. Human clinical evidence is very limited and largely anecdotal. No randomised controlled trials support its therapeutic claims. Allergy to insect proteins is a contraindication. Potential for heavy metal and microbial contamination with unregulated preparations. Should be used with caution and only from verified, tested sources.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Galleria mellonella
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Specialty
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Specialty
Ingredient Wax Moth Larva Extract
Scientific name Galleria mellonella
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Specialty
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Wax Moth Larva Extract indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Wax Moth Larva Extract
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Galleria mellonella
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:09

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Antimicrobial effects and mechanism of action of carboxymethyl chitosan-loaded silver ion complexes against drug-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus. ↗
    Journal J Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Jin L et al.. Antimicrobial effects and mechanism of action of carboxymethyl chitosan-loaded silver ion complexes against drug-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus.. J Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41937392.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Comparative profiling of virulence determinants, capsular serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance in hypervirulent and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from liver abscess patients. ↗
    Journal Int Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liu J et al.. Comparative profiling of virulence determinants, capsular serotypes, and antimicrobial resistance in hypervirulent and classical Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from liver abscess patients.. Int Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41926004.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated in Brazil have important virulence related genes and survive to different stress conditions. ↗
    Journal Braz J Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Frazu00e3o MR et al.. Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated in Brazil have important virulence related genes and survive to different stress conditions.. Braz J Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41920224.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Differential roles of Scj1 and Djp1, two DnaJ homologs, in virulence, cell wall integrity, and multi-stress tolerance of Beauveria bassiana. ↗
    Journal Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hu W et al.. Differential roles of Scj1 and Djp1, two DnaJ homologs, in virulence, cell wall integrity, and multi-stress tolerance of Beauveria bassiana.. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2026. PMID:41920222.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Trans-cinnamaldehyde triggers stringent response-mediated virulence attenuation in pathogenic Escherichia coli. ↗
    Journal Biomed Pharmacother
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Karczewska M et al.. Trans-cinnamaldehyde triggers stringent response-mediated virulence attenuation in pathogenic Escherichia coli.. Biomed Pharmacother. 2026. PMID:41916131.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Characterization of a ST412-K57 colistin-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae strain of chicken origin. ↗
    Journal J Antimicrob Chemother
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Xu Q et al.. Characterization of a ST412-K57 colistin-resistant hypervirulent Klebsiella pneumoniae strain of chicken origin.. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2026. PMID:41914556.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Dual-Peptide Nanoplatform: Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Functionalized With a Cell-Penetrating Peptide and Loaded With Rationally Designed Antimicrobial Peptides for Tuberculosis Therapy. ↗
    Journal Adv Healthc Mater
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Carnero Canales CS et al.. Dual-Peptide Nanoplatform: Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles Functionalized With a Cell-Penetrating Peptide and Loaded With Rationally Designed Antimicrobial Peptides for Tuberculosis Therapy.. Adv Healthc Mater. 2026. PMID:41906540.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Design and optimization of the surfactant mixture ratio for oleic acid-based ophthalmic nanoemulsions prepared by the HPH technology - feasibility study for… ↗
    Journal Eur J Pharm Biopharm
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gawin-Mikou0142ajewicz A et al.. Design and optimization of the surfactant mixture ratio for oleic acid-based ophthalmic nanoemulsions prepared by the HPH technology - feasibility study for clotrimazole as a model drug.. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2026. PMID:41903825.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Host-Associated Responses in a Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 Clinical Isolate. ↗
    Journal Pathogens
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hua M et al.. Phenotypic and Transcriptomic Characterization of Host-Associated Responses in a Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11 Clinical Isolate.. Pathogens. 2026. PMID:41901735.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Extracellular Vesicles from the Probiotic Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii: Proteomic Characterization and Modulation of Immune and Defense Responses in an Induced Inflammation Model… ↗
    Journal Nutrients
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Maione A et al.. Extracellular Vesicles from the Probiotic Yeast Pichia kudriavzevii: Proteomic Characterization and Modulation of Immune and Defense Responses in an Induced Inflammation Model of Intestinal Epithelial Cells.. Nutrients. 2026. PMID:41901087.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Wax Moth Larva Extract. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Wax Moth Larva Extract

GIRI Score 3.5 / 10

A score of 3.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.