ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Vitamin

Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate)

Sodium L-ascorbate

Also known as: sodium ascorbate, buffered vitamin C, sodium vitamin C

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Sodium content relevant for low-sodium diets -- hypertension, heart failure
  • GI distress at high doses of vitamin C equivalent
  • Kidney stone risk in predisposed individuals at high doses
  • Monitor total sodium intake when combining with other sodium-containing supplements

Contraindications

  • Sodium content relevant for low-sodium diets -- hypertension, heart failure
  • GI distress at high doses of vitamin C equivalent
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Sodium ascorbate is a buffered form of vitamin C that is less acidic than ascorbic acid. The sodium content (approximately 131 mg sodium per 1,000 mg vitamin C) is relevant for individuals on sodium-restricted diets, such as those with hypertension or heart failure. Otherwise the safety profile mirrors ascorbic acid.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Sodium L-ascorbate
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Vitamin
Key Safety Concern Sodium content relevant for low-sodium diets -- hypertension, heart failure
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Vitamin
Main Safety Concern Sodium content relevant for low-sodium diets -- hypertension, heart failure
Ingredient Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate)
Scientific name Sodium L-ascorbate
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Vitamin
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Sodium content relevant for low-sodium diets -- hypertension, heart failure
  • GI distress at high doses of vitamin C equivalent
  • Kidney stone risk in predisposed individuals at high doses
  • Monitor total sodium intake when combining with other sodium-containing supplements
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate) indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate)
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Sodium L-ascorbate
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 07:53

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Ascorbate-enabled C-H bond amination catalyzed by myoglobin reconstituted with a trifluoromethyl-substituted Iron porphyrin. ↗
    Journal J Inorg Biochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sonoda C et al.. Ascorbate-enabled C-H bond amination catalyzed by myoglobin reconstituted with a trifluoromethyl-substituted Iron porphyrin.. J Inorg Biochem. 2026. PMID:41494238.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Metabolomic Profiling and Characterization of a Novel 3D Culture System for Studying Chondrocyte Mechanotransduction. ↗
    Journal Cell Mol Bioeng
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Brahmachary PP et al.. Metabolomic Profiling and Characterization of a Novel 3D Culture System for Studying Chondrocyte Mechanotransduction.. Cell Mol Bioeng. 2025. PMID:41328310.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Impact of the Use of 2-Phospho-L Ascorbic Acid in the Production of Engineered Stromal Tissue for Regenerative Medicine. ↗
    Journal Cells
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Brownell D et al.. Impact of the Use of 2-Phospho-L Ascorbic Acid in the Production of Engineered Stromal Tissue for Regenerative Medicine.. Cells. 2025. PMID:40710376.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Metabolomic Profiling and Characterization of a Novel 3D Culture System for Studying Chondrocyte Mechanotransduction. ↗
    Journal bioRxiv
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Brahmachary PP et al.. Metabolomic Profiling and Characterization of a Novel 3D Culture System for Studying Chondrocyte Mechanotransduction.. bioRxiv. 2025. PMID:38915493.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Long-Term Storage of Ti(3)C(2)T(x) Aqueous Dispersion with Stable Electrochemical Properties. ↗
    Journal Materials (Basel)
    Year 2024
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Peng T et al.. Long-Term Storage of Ti(3)C(2)T(x) Aqueous Dispersion with Stable Electrochemical Properties.. Materials (Basel). 2024. PMID:39597238.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Less is More: Underlying Mechanism of Zn Electrode Long-Term Stability using Sodium L-Ascorbate as Electrolyte Additive. ↗
    Journal Small
    Year 2024
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Luo Y et al.. Less is More: Underlying Mechanism of Zn Electrode Long-Term Stability using Sodium L-Ascorbate as Electrolyte Additive.. Small. 2024. PMID:38282374.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Carotenoid-dependent singlet oxygen photogeneration in light-harvesting complex 2 of Ectothiorhodospira haloalkaliphila leads to the formation of organic hydroperoxides and damage to both… ↗
    Journal PeerJ
    Year 2024
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yanykin D et al.. Carotenoid-dependent singlet oxygen photogeneration in light-harvesting complex 2 of Ectothiorhodospira haloalkaliphila leads to the formation of organic hydroperoxides and damage to both pigments and protein matrix.. PeerJ. 2024. PMID:38250719.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A highly selective and sensitive fluorescence probe for dopamine determination based on a bisquinoline-substituted calix[4]arene carboxylic acid derivative. ↗
    Journal J Biomol Struct Dyn
    Year 2024
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sayin S. A highly selective and sensitive fluorescence probe for dopamine determination based on a bisquinoline-substituted calix[4]arene carboxylic acid derivative.. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2024. PMID:37938142.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Azide-Assisted Growth of Copper Nanostructures and Their Application as a Carbon Supported Catalyst in Two-Step Three-Component Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions. ↗
    Journal Langmuir
    Year 2023
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Roemer M et al.. Azide-Assisted Growth of Copper Nanostructures and Their Application as a Carbon Supported Catalyst in Two-Step Three-Component Azide-Alkyne Cycloadditions.. Langmuir. 2023. PMID:37585437.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Development of Highly Sensitive and Humidity Independent Room Temeprature NO(2) Gas Sensor Using Two Dimensional Ti(3)C(2)T(x) Nanosheets and One Dimensional WO(3) Nanorods… ↗
    Journal ACS Sens
    Year 2022
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gasso S et al.. Development of Highly Sensitive and Humidity Independent Room Temeprature NO(2) Gas Sensor Using Two Dimensional Ti(3)C(2)T(x) Nanosheets and One Dimensional WO(3) Nanorods Nanocomposite.. ACS Sens. 2022. PMID:35944209.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate). Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Vitamin C (Sodium Ascorbate)

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.