ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 16, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Vitamin

Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide)

Nicotinamide

Also known as: niacinamide, nicotinamide, vitamin B3 amide, nicotinic acid amide

MODERATE RISK 4.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 4.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Hepatotoxicity at doses above 3 g per day -- liver enzyme elevations
  • Insulin resistance and blood sugar worsening at high doses
  • No flushing (unlike niacin) but same hepatic risk at high doses
  • UL applies as with niacin -- 35 mg per day for the no-flush form at the tolerable upper level

Contraindications

  • Hepatotoxicity at doses above 3 g per day -- liver enzyme elevations
  • Insulin resistance and blood sugar worsening at high doses
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Niacinamide (nicotinamide) is the amide form of vitamin B3 that does NOT cause the flushing associated with nicotinic acid. Widely used in skincare and supplements. At high doses above 3 g per day, hepatotoxicity risk emerges — liver enzyme elevations have been reported. It also causes insulin resistance at high doses and may worsen blood sugar control. Less cardiovascular risk than niacin but similar hepatic risk at pharmacological doses.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Nicotinamide
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Vitamin
Key Safety Concern Hepatotoxicity at doses above 3 g per day -- liver enzyme elevations
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Vitamin
Main Safety Concern Hepatotoxicity at doses above 3 g per day -- liver enzyme elevations
Ingredient Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide)
Scientific name Nicotinamide
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Vitamin
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Hepatotoxicity at doses above 3 g per day -- liver enzyme elevations
  • Insulin resistance and blood sugar worsening at high doses
  • No flushing (unlike niacin) but same hepatic risk at high doses
  • UL applies as with niacin -- 35 mg per day for the no-flush form at the tolerable upper level
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide) indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide)
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Nicotinamide
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 07:56

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Efficacy and Safety of a Topical Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Skinbooster for the Treatment of Melasma. ↗
    Journal Aesthetic Plast Surg
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yi KH et al.. Efficacy and Safety of a Topical Nicotinamide Adenine Dinucleotide Skinbooster for the Treatment of Melasma.. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2026. PMID:41870519.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Author Response: Letter in Response to the Article: Utility of Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyl Transferase as a Novel Biomarker in Predicting Early Severe… ↗
    Journal Indian J Crit Care Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Rao S et al.. Author Response: Letter in Response to the Article: Utility of Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyl Transferase as a Novel Biomarker in Predicting Early Severe Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2026. PMID:41868083.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Letter in Response to the Article: Utility of Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyl Transferase as a Novel Biomarker in Predicting Early Severe Organ Dysfunction… ↗
    Journal Indian J Crit Care Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ghatak T et al.. Letter in Response to the Article: Utility of Extracellular Nicotinamide Phosphoribosyl Transferase as a Novel Biomarker in Predicting Early Severe Organ Dysfunction and Mortality in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Prospective Observational Study.. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2026. PMID:41868066.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    PANoptosis in Alzheimer's disease: The expanding landscape of programmed cell death mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. ↗
    Journal Free Radic Biol Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Paidlewar M et al.. PANoptosis in Alzheimer's disease: The expanding landscape of programmed cell death mechanisms and therapeutic interventions.. Free Radic Biol Med. 2026. PMID:41864364.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A ketogenic diet reduces hepatic alcohol metabolism and alcohol consumption in rats. ↗
    Journal Neuropsychopharmacology
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Elvig SK et al.. A ketogenic diet reduces hepatic alcohol metabolism and alcohol consumption in rats.. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2026. PMID:41862734.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    DLK, NMNAT2, and SARM1: Judge, Jury, and Executioner in Axon Degeneration. ↗
    Journal Annu Rev Biochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hinz FI et al.. DLK, NMNAT2, and SARM1: Judge, Jury, and Executioner in Axon Degeneration.. Annu Rev Biochem. 2026. PMID:41861244.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Evaluation of effectiveness of oleanolic acid in rat testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury model. ↗
    Journal Pol J Vet Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wei SM et al.. Evaluation of effectiveness of oleanolic acid in rat testicular ischemia-reperfusion injury model.. Pol J Vet Sci. 2026. PMID:41859995.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The NAD-brain pharmacokinetic study of NAD augmentation in blood and brain using oral precursor supplementation. ↗
    Journal iScience
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Berven H et al.. The NAD-brain pharmacokinetic study of NAD augmentation in blood and brain using oral precursor supplementation.. iScience. 2026. PMID:41858901.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Molecular and cellular consequences of tumour-autonomous IL-6 signalling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. ↗
    Journal Gut
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gehl V et al.. Molecular and cellular consequences of tumour-autonomous IL-6 signalling in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma.. Gut. 2026. PMID:41856523.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Nicotinamide (Vitamin B3) Deficiency in Follicular Fluid of Patients With Ovarian Ageing. ↗
    Journal J Cell Mol Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bocca C et al.. Nicotinamide (Vitamin B3) Deficiency in Follicular Fluid of Patients With Ovarian Ageing.. J Cell Mol Med. 2026. PMID:41853933.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 4.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 4.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide). Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 4.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
4.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Vitamin B3 (Niacinamide)

GIRI Score 4.0 / 10

A score of 4.0 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.