ორშაბათი, აპრილი 13, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Vitamin

Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)

Cyanocobalamin

Also known as: Cyanocobalamin, cobalamin, vitamin B12

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Cyanide moiety — theoretical concern in renal failure and tobacco amblyopia (rare)
  • Very high serum B12 may be a marker of underlying malignancy — not a cause
  • Parenteral large doses may cause acne-like skin eruptions (rare)
  • May interact with metformin (metformin impairs B12 absorption)

Contraindications

  • Cyanide moiety — theoretical concern in renal failure and tobacco amblyopia (rare)
  • Very high serum B12 may be a marker of underlying malignancy — not a cause
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Cyanocobalamin is the most common synthetic form of vitamin B12 in supplements. It is water-soluble with a very high safety margin. Very high serum B12 levels are associated with certain malignancies (hepatocellular carcinoma, haematological cancers) though this is likely confounding — high B12 may be a marker, not a cause. Cyanocobalamin contains a cyanide moiety which is metabolised normally at supplement doses but may be relevant in cyanide metabolism disorders.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Cyanocobalamin
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Vitamin
Key Safety Concern Cyanide moiety — theoretical concern in renal failure and tobacco amblyopia (rare)
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Vitamin
Main Safety Concern Cyanide moiety — theoretical concern in renal failure and tobacco amblyopia (rare)
Ingredient Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
Scientific name Cyanocobalamin
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Vitamin
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Cyanide moiety — theoretical concern in renal failure and tobacco amblyopia (rare)
  • Very high serum B12 may be a marker of underlying malignancy — not a cause
  • Parenteral large doses may cause acne-like skin eruptions (rare)
  • May interact with metformin (metformin impairs B12 absorption)
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin) indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Cyanocobalamin
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 23 მარ 2026, 15:05

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Population-based deprescribing strategy for proton pump inhibitors: health outcomes from a case-control study. ↗
    Journal Med Clin (Barc)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Echeverru00eda Gorriti A et al.. Population-based deprescribing strategy for proton pump inhibitors: health outcomes from a case-control study.. Med Clin (Barc). 2026. PMID:41832801.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Acquired Multiple Acyl-Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency Associated With Sertraline in Sweden-A Nationwide Population-Based Study. ↗
    Journal Eur J Neurol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sunebo S et al.. Acquired Multiple Acyl-Coenzyme A Dehydrogenase Deficiency Associated With Sertraline in Sweden-A Nationwide Population-Based Study.. Eur J Neurol. 2026. PMID:41808636.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Amelioration of postpartum hyperketonemia using amino acids, cyanocobalamin, inositol, u03b1-lipoic acid or monensin during the transition period of dairy cows. ↗
    Journal J Dairy Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lisuzzo A et al.. Amelioration of postpartum hyperketonemia using amino acids, cyanocobalamin, inositol, u03b1-lipoic acid or monensin during the transition period of dairy cows.. J Dairy Sci. 2026. PMID:41780858.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Unveiling the Pernicious Truth: A Case Report on the Rare Presentation of Severe Vitamin B12 Deficiency. ↗
    Journal Cureus
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Akinola OO et al.. Unveiling the Pernicious Truth: A Case Report on the Rare Presentation of Severe Vitamin B12 Deficiency.. Cureus. 2026. PMID:41717155.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Scope for vitamin B deficiency redressal through microbial vitamins with reference to India and South Africa. ↗
    Journal Crit Rev Biotechnol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Nayak PP et al.. Scope for vitamin B deficiency redressal through microbial vitamins with reference to India and South Africa.. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2026. PMID:41714150.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    PMVE/MA-based microneedle patches for rapid transdermal delivery of vitamin B12: fabrication and evaluation. ↗
    Journal Drug Deliv Transl Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Saurabh S et al.. PMVE/MA-based microneedle patches for rapid transdermal delivery of vitamin B12: fabrication and evaluation.. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2026. PMID:41708905.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Cobalt Toxicity. ↗
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chen RJ et al.. Cobalt Toxicity.. 2026. PMID:36508548.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Compounded Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Products Use Unique Formulations but Efficacy and Safety Largely Unknown. ↗
    Journal Ann Pharmacother
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Belcourt J et al.. Compounded Semaglutide and Tirzepatide Products Use Unique Formulations but Efficacy and Safety Largely Unknown.. Ann Pharmacother. 2026. PMID:41689811.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Selective Surface-Confinement and Elegant Sensing of Vitamin B12 on Hydroxyl-Functionalized Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode. ↗
    Journal Langmuir
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yashly YK et al.. Selective Surface-Confinement and Elegant Sensing of Vitamin B12 on Hydroxyl-Functionalized Screen-Printed Carbon Electrode.. Langmuir. 2026. PMID:41685559.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Thiamine Deficiency After Bariatric Surgery: Early Neurological Complications and Nutritional Monitoring. ↗
    Journal Cureus
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Remelhe Su00e1 S et al.. Thiamine Deficiency After Bariatric Surgery: Early Neurological Complications and Nutritional Monitoring.. Cureus. 2026. PMID:41635330.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin). Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Vitamin B12 (Cyanocobalamin)

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.