Safety Profile
Known Safety Concerns
- Limited long-term human safety data beyond 3 months
- FDA GRAS status pending -- relatively new supplement ingredient
- Produced by only ~40% of people from diet -- direct supplementation bypasses gut microbiome
- Rare: GI discomfort in Phase 1 trials
Contraindications
- Limited long-term human safety data beyond 3 months
- FDA GRAS status pending -- relatively new supplement ingredient
Interactions
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Evidence and Scientific Findings
Ingredient Overview
Urolithin A is a gut microbiome-derived metabolite from ellagitannins (pomegranate, walnuts) that induces mitophagy — selective removal of dysfunctional mitochondria. Sold as the branded ingredient Mitopure. Phase 1 trials show safety at 250-1000 mg/day. Long-term safety data is limited. FDA GRAS notification filed.
Biological and Chemical Classification
- Scientific Name
- Urolithin A (3,8-dihydroxy-6H-dibenzo[b,d]pyran-6-one)
Mechanism of Action
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Pharmacokinetics
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Recommended Dosage
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index
Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
- Main clinical benefit observed: Metabolic
- Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
- Limited long-term human safety data beyond 3 months
- FDA GRAS status pending -- relatively new supplement ingredient
- Produced by only ~40% of people from diet -- direct supplementation bypasses gut microbiome
- Rare: GI discomfort in Phase 1 trials
The available scientific evidence for Urolithin A indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.
Total SETI Score
High risk| Evidence quality | 10/40 |
| Evidence consistency | 20/20 |
| Safety signals | 0/20 |
| Study recency | 10/10 |
| Evidence transparency | 10/10 |
Evidence Summary
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
- 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
- 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)
Evidence Policy
Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.
Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 17:56
Evidence Distribution
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWTrihexyl phosphate exposure disrupts mitophagy and activates mtDNA-cGAS-STING signaling to drive pyroptosis and steroidogenic impairment in Leydig cells. ↗Dai Y et al.. Trihexyl phosphate exposure disrupts mitophagy and activates mtDNA-cGAS-STING signaling to drive pyroptosis and steroidogenic impairment in Leydig cells.. J Hazard Mater. 2026. PMID:41875563.PMID 41875563 ↗Journal J Hazard MaterYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41875563/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWUrolithin A From Gut Metabolite to Therapeutic Agent: Bioavailability, Mechanisms, and Translational Insights. ↗Yuan H et al.. Urolithin A From Gut Metabolite to Therapeutic Agent: Bioavailability, Mechanisms, and Translational Insights.. J Food Sci. 2026. PMID:41866331.PMID 41866331 ↗Journal J Food SciYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41866331/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWPotential impact of urolithin A on pathways relevant to sleep health: a mini review. ↗Pinaffi-Langley ACDC et al.. Potential impact of urolithin A on pathways relevant to sleep health: a mini review.. Front Nutr. 2026. PMID:41859662.PMID 41859662 ↗Journal Front NutrYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41859662/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWBeyond Supportive Care: Mitochondria as a Strategic Therapeutic Avenue in Acute Pancreatitis. ↗Chooklin S et al.. Beyond Supportive Care: Mitochondria as a Strategic Therapeutic Avenue in Acute Pancreatitis.. Dig Dis Sci. 2026. PMID:41854947.PMID 41854947 ↗Journal Dig Dis SciYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41854947/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWUrolithin A Attenuates Aging-Induced Liver Injury by Inhibiting Nur77 Ubiquitination and Degradation. ↗Xiao J et al.. Urolithin A Attenuates Aging-Induced Liver Injury by Inhibiting Nur77 Ubiquitination and Degradation.. J Agric Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41837341.PMID 41837341 ↗Journal J Agric Food ChemYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41837341/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWThe interplay between mitophagy andu00a0ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications. ↗Liu A et al.. The interplay between mitophagy andu00a0ferroptosis in Alzheimer's disease: Mechanisms and therapeutic implications.. J Alzheimers Dis. 2026. PMID:41823685.PMID 41823685 ↗Journal J Alzheimers DisYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41823685/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWImpaired mitophagy contributes to osteogenesis and mineralization disorders in fibrous dysplasia. ↗Ling Z et al.. Impaired mitophagy contributes to osteogenesis and mineralization disorders in fibrous dysplasia.. Autophagy. 2026. PMID:41803635.PMID 41803635 ↗Journal AutophagyYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41803635/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWUrolithin 9-dehydroxylase from Enterocloster bolteae JCM 12243(T) catalyzing regiospecific dehydroxylation of urolithins. ↗Katasho A et al.. Urolithin 9-dehydroxylase from Enterocloster bolteae JCM 12243(T) catalyzing regiospecific dehydroxylation of urolithins.. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2026. PMID:41797252.PMID 41797252 ↗Journal Enzyme Microb TechnolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41797252/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWFUNDC1-dependent mitophagy determines axon regeneration capacity. ↗Li W et al.. FUNDC1-dependent mitophagy determines axon regeneration capacity.. Autophagy. 2026. PMID:41795666.PMID 41795666 ↗Journal AutophagyYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41795666/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWNeuroprotective effects of Urolithin A and B in an intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's-like model in rats. ↗Salari MT et al.. Neuroprotective effects of Urolithin A and B in an intracerebroventricular streptozotocin-induced Alzheimer's-like model in rats.. BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2026. PMID:41794870.PMID 41794870 ↗Journal BMC Pharmacol ToxicolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41794870/
Score Transparency
0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.
Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies
Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.
Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals
Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.
One or more monitoring-level safety signals active
Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.
Final GIRI Score for Urolithin A. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
Full methodology & data sources
The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.
- References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
- Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
- Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
- Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
Risk Level Classification
Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.
0–3.0
3.0–5.5
5.5–7.5
7.5–10
The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.
What drove the Low classification for Urolithin A
A score of 3.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
0 approved references.
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).
Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.
No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.
No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).
How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?
The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:
| Level | Score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | 0.0 – 2.9 | Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts. |
| MODERATE | 3.0 – 5.4 | Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups. |
| HIGH | 5.5 – 7.4 | Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended. |
| CRITICAL | 7.5 – 10 | Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision. |
Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.


