ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 30, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Probiotic

Streptococcus Thermophilus

Streptococcus thermophilus (Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus)

Also known as: S. thermophilus, yogurt starter culture, thermophilic streptococcus

LOW RISK 1.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 1.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Theoretical virulence gene transfer (extremely rare)
  • Theoretical bacteremia in severely immunocompromised patients
  • Shares genus with pathogenic streptococci -- species verification important

Contraindications

  • Theoretical virulence gene transfer (extremely rare)
  • Theoretical bacteremia in severely immunocompromised patients
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Streptococcus thermophilus is a food-grade lactic acid bacterium used in yogurt and cheese production with GRAS status and extensive human consumption history. Produces lactase, beneficial in lactose intolerance.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Streptococcus thermophilus (Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus)
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Probiotic
Key Safety Concern Theoretical virulence gene transfer (extremely rare)
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Probiotic
Main Safety Concern Theoretical virulence gene transfer (extremely rare)
Ingredient Streptococcus Thermophilus
Scientific name Streptococcus thermophilus (Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus)
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Probiotic
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Theoretical virulence gene transfer (extremely rare)
  • Theoretical bacteremia in severely immunocompromised patients
  • Shares genus with pathogenic streptococci -- species verification important
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Streptococcus Thermophilus indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Streptococcus Thermophilus
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Streptococcus thermophilus (Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilus)
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 22:46

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Diet-microbiome associations in 10,068 individuals from the Human Phenotype Project to guide personalized nutrition. ↗
    Journal Nat Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Segev T et al.. Diet-microbiome associations in 10,068 individuals from the Human Phenotype Project to guide personalized nutrition.. Nat Med. 2026. PMID:41872600.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Supragingival dental biofilm microbiomes of tobacco heating system smokers, cigarette smokers and non-smokers. ↗
    Journal Clin Oral Investig
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bou017eac E et al.. Supragingival dental biofilm microbiomes of tobacco heating system smokers, cigarette smokers and non-smokers.. Clin Oral Investig. 2026. PMID:41870676.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The effects of dairy products containing Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus on bone turnover biomarkers and bone mineral density: a pilot trial… ↗
    Journal Front Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Rueangsri N et al.. The effects of dairy products containing Lactobacillus bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus on bone turnover biomarkers and bone mineral density: a pilot trial study.. Front Nutr. 2026. PMID:41867674.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Role of microbial interactions in the impaired cultivability of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria in natural whey starter for Parmigiano Reggiano PDO cheese… ↗
    Journal Front Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Cristofolini M et al.. Role of microbial interactions in the impaired cultivability of thermophilic lactic acid bacteria in natural whey starter for Parmigiano Reggiano PDO cheese production.. Front Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41859451.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effect of low-dose irradiation of starter culture on fermentation and physicochemical properties of set-type yogurt. ↗
    Journal Int J Radiat Biol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Danyo EK et al.. Effect of low-dose irradiation of starter culture on fermentation and physicochemical properties of set-type yogurt.. Int J Radiat Biol. 2026. PMID:41854434.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Potential use of whey in kefir production: evaluation of fermentation kinetics and microbiota. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Anim Resour
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Biu00e7er Y et al.. Potential use of whey in kefir production: evaluation of fermentation kinetics and microbiota.. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2026. PMID:41849038.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Yogurt application and postbiotic effects on mouse intestinal cells of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei HKWS110u00a0isolated from Prunus yedoensis. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Anim Resour
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mijid N et al.. Yogurt application and postbiotic effects on mouse intestinal cells of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei HKWS110u00a0isolated from Prunus yedoensis.. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2026. PMID:41848934.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Developing Indigenous Plant-Enriched Yogurt to Enhance Iron Solubility-A Collaboration With Senegalese Women Farmers. ↗
    Journal J Food Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ifeh C et al.. Developing Indigenous Plant-Enriched Yogurt to Enhance Iron Solubility-A Collaboration With Senegalese Women Farmers.. J Food Sci. 2026. PMID:41830445.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A Pressure Cook-Cool Process with Coconut Oil and Thai Herbs Enhances Resistant Starch, Antioxidant Activity, and Prebiotic Potential in Khao Dawk Mali… ↗
    Journal Foods
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Luang-In V et al.. A Pressure Cook-Cool Process with Coconut Oil and Thai Herbs Enhances Resistant Starch, Antioxidant Activity, and Prebiotic Potential in Khao Dawk Mali 105 (KDML 105).. Foods. 2026. PMID:41829107.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Gut Microbiota Signatures and Potential Mediators in the Trajectory of Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Phased Atlas by Genetic Inference. ↗
    Journal Int J Med Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhou Y et al.. Gut Microbiota Signatures and Potential Mediators in the Trajectory of Age-related Macular Degeneration: A Phased Atlas by Genetic Inference.. Int J Med Sci. 2026. PMID:41799763.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 1.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 1.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Streptococcus Thermophilus. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 1.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
1.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Streptococcus Thermophilus

GIRI Score 1.5 / 10

A score of 1.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.