ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 16, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Joint Support

Sodium Hyaluronate

Also known as: Hyaluronic acid sodium salt, Sodium hyaluronidase

LOW RISK 1.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 1.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Sodium hyaluronate is the sodium salt form of hyaluronic acid, identical in bioactivity. Oral intake is well tolerated. Very safe at recommended doses with no meaningful drug interactions documented.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Joint Support
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Joint Support
Ingredient Sodium Hyaluronate
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Joint Support
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Sodium Hyaluronate indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Sodium Hyaluronate
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 26 მარ 2026, 14:15

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Intra-articular dual-targeted hydrogel co-delivering diacerein nanoparticles and ketorolac for modulating neuroimmune interplay and cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis. ↗
    Journal Drug Deliv Transl Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Heikal LA et al.. Intra-articular dual-targeted hydrogel co-delivering diacerein nanoparticles and ketorolac for modulating neuroimmune interplay and cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis.. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2026. PMID:41874937.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Safety and Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler for Neck Wrinkles: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial. ↗
    Journal Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Jiang M et al.. Safety and Efficacy of Hyaluronic Acid-Based Filler for Neck Wrinkles: A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2026. PMID:41873431.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A Hybrid Gel of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Nasolabial Folds by Ligament-targeted Injection. ↗
    Journal Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang S et al.. A Hybrid Gel of Hyaluronic Acid and Poly-L-Lactic Acid for Nasolabial Folds by Ligament-targeted Injection.. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2026. PMID:41867340.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Suprachoroidal VIsco-bucKlING versus gas tamponade for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (VIKING): study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, controlled feasibility study. ↗
    Journal Pilot Feasibility Stud
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Saidkasimova S et al.. Suprachoroidal VIsco-bucKlING versus gas tamponade for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (VIKING): study protocol for a multi-centre, randomised, controlled feasibility study.. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2026. PMID:41845462.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    [Thumbtack needling combined with sodium hyaluronate eye drops for moderate-to-severe dry eye]. ↗
    Journal Zhongguo Zhen Jiu
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    An Y et al.. [Thumbtack needling combined with sodium hyaluronate eye drops for moderate-to-severe dry eye].. Zhongguo Zhen Jiu. 2026. PMID:41839595.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Conservative Treatments May Show No Significant Differences for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. ↗
    Journal Arthroscopy
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liu G et al.. Conservative Treatments May Show No Significant Differences for Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.. Arthroscopy. 2026. PMID:41838489.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Construction of soluble sufentanil microneedles and their analgesic effects in a mouse model of cancer pain. ↗
    Journal J Mater Chem B
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhao A et al.. Construction of soluble sufentanil microneedles and their analgesic effects in a mouse model of cancer pain.. J Mater Chem B. 2026. PMID:41837882.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Bioactive Platinum Nanozymes Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing via Anti-Inflammation and Macrophage Polarization Modulation. ↗
    Journal Int J Nanomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Shi L et al.. Bioactive Platinum Nanozymes Accelerate Diabetic Wound Healing via Anti-Inflammation and Macrophage Polarization Modulation.. Int J Nanomedicine. 2026. PMID:41836724.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Tacrolimus for Dry Eye Disease: Translational Insights from Animal Models and Clinical Studies into Molecular Pathways and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms. ↗
    Journal Curr Pharm Des
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ivraghi MS et al.. Tacrolimus for Dry Eye Disease: Translational Insights from Animal Models and Clinical Studies into Molecular Pathways and Anti-Inflammatory Mechanisms.. Curr Pharm Des. 2026. PMID:41832678.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Sodium hyaluronate based multifunctional hydrogels delivering SiRNA for sustained silencing of SMAD3: A novel strategy to treat intrauterine adhesions. ↗
    Journal Carbohydr Polym
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chen K et al.. Sodium hyaluronate based multifunctional hydrogels delivering SiRNA for sustained silencing of SMAD3: A novel strategy to treat intrauterine adhesions.. Carbohydr Polym. 2026. PMID:41832026.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 1.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 1.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Sodium Hyaluronate. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 1.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
1.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Sodium Hyaluronate

GIRI Score 1.5 / 10

A score of 1.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.