ორშაბათი, ივნისი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Rutin

Rutin (quercetin-3-rutinoside) from Sophora japonica

Also known as: rutin, rutoside, sophorin, quercetin-3-rhamnosyl-glucoside, vitamin P

LOW RISK 3.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect -- caution with warfarin and aspirin
  • CYP3A4 inhibition -- drug interaction potential
  • Rare allergic reactions
  • Generally well tolerated at standard doses

Contraindications

  • Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect -- caution with warfarin and aspirin
  • CYP3A4 inhibition -- drug interaction potential
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Rutin is a quercetin glycoside used for capillary fragility, venous insufficiency, and as an antioxidant. It inhibits platelet aggregation and has anticoagulant properties. CYP3A4 inhibitor — drug interaction potential. Well tolerated at standard doses.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Rutin (quercetin-3-rutinoside) from Sophora japonica
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect -- caution with warfarin and aspirin
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect -- caution with warfarin and aspirin
Ingredient Rutin
Scientific name Rutin (quercetin-3-rutinoside) from Sophora japonica
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Antiplatelet and anticoagulant effect -- caution with warfarin and aspirin
  • CYP3A4 inhibition -- drug interaction potential
  • Rare allergic reactions
  • Generally well tolerated at standard doses
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Rutin indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Rutin
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Rutin (quercetin-3-rutinoside) from Sophora japonica
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 17:36

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Modification of Gliadin with Rha/PGA/Ta for Rutin-Loaded Hollow Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and In Vitro Digestion. ↗
    Journal J Agric Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gao J et al.. Modification of Gliadin with Rha/PGA/Ta for Rutin-Loaded Hollow Nanoparticles: Preparation, Properties, and In Vitro Digestion.. J Agric Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41877386.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Ti(3)C(2)/CuCoSe(2) p-n Heterojunction: Preparation and Mechanism for Machine Learning-enhanced Electrochemical Sensing of Rutin. ↗
    Journal Anal Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li Q et al.. Ti(3)C(2)/CuCoSe(2) p-n Heterojunction: Preparation and Mechanism for Machine Learning-enhanced Electrochemical Sensing of Rutin.. Anal Chem. 2026. PMID:41877376.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Insights into the flavonoid composition and antioxidant activity of Jeramon, a novel Korean lemon cultivar. ↗
    Journal Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lee CD et al.. Insights into the flavonoid composition and antioxidant activity of Jeramon, a novel Korean lemon cultivar.. Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41875772.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Beneficial rhizobacteria and virus infection modulate the soybean metabolome and influence the feeding preferences of the virus vector Epilachna varivestis. ↗
    Journal New Phytol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Pulido H et al.. Beneficial rhizobacteria and virus infection modulate the soybean metabolome and influence the feeding preferences of the virus vector Epilachna varivestis.. New Phytol. 2026. PMID:41874262.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Targeting Quorum Sensing LsrR Protein in E. coli: A Computational Approach to Screen the Plant Bioactive Compounds as Inhibitors of Biofilm Formation… ↗
    Journal Assay Drug Dev Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Vijaya Prabhu S et al.. Targeting Quorum Sensing LsrR Protein in E. coli: A Computational Approach to Screen the Plant Bioactive Compounds as Inhibitors of Biofilm Formation in Urinary Tract Infections.. Assay Drug Dev Technol. 2026. PMID:41869957.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Optimized extraction of polyphenols from rooibos tea (Aspalathus linearis) and their biological activities. ↗
    Journal Front Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Othman MM et al.. Optimized extraction of polyphenols from rooibos tea (Aspalathus linearis) and their biological activities.. Front Nutr. 2026. PMID:41867690.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phenolic-Enriched Pullulan Coatings: Molecular Interactions and Functional Properties for Active Food Packaging Applications. ↗
    Journal ACS Omega
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    John A et al.. Phenolic-Enriched Pullulan Coatings: Molecular Interactions and Functional Properties for Active Food Packaging Applications.. ACS Omega. 2026. PMID:41867551.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Multifunctional silver nanoparticles-loaded rutin functionalised sodium alginate beads: Catalysis, corrosion resistance, bactericidal and anti-oxidant studies. ↗
    Journal Int J Biol Macromol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Samal S et al.. Multifunctional silver nanoparticles-loaded rutin functionalised sodium alginate beads: Catalysis, corrosion resistance, bactericidal and anti-oxidant studies.. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41865933.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Divergent Biochemical Strategies and Organ-Specific Metabolic Adjustments in Spinach Mediated by Exogenous Amino Acids Under Salt Stress. ↗
    Journal Physiol Plant
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Turfan N et al.. Divergent Biochemical Strategies and Organ-Specific Metabolic Adjustments in Spinach Mediated by Exogenous Amino Acids Under Salt Stress.. Physiol Plant. 2026. PMID:41858176.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A Biomimetic Protein Immobilization Method for Studying Drug-Protein Interactions Based on Affinity Capillary Electrochromatography. ↗
    Journal Electrophoresis
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Cui J et al.. A Biomimetic Protein Immobilization Method for Studying Drug-Protein Interactions Based on Affinity Capillary Electrochromatography.. Electrophoresis. 2026. PMID:41858158.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Rutin. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 3.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Rutin

GIRI Score 3.0 / 10

A score of 3.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.