ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Rhodiola Rosea

Rhodiola rosea

Also known as: Golden root, arctic root, roseroot, SHR-5

LOW RISK 3.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Stimulating effect may cause insomnia or irritability at high doses
  • Possible interaction with antidepressants (MAOIs, SSRIs)
  • May lower blood pressure and blood sugar
  • Avoid in bipolar disorder -- may trigger manic episodes

Contraindications

  • Stimulating effect may cause insomnia or irritability at high doses
  • Possible interaction with antidepressants (MAOIs, SSRIs)
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Rhodiola rosea is an adaptogenic herb used for stress, fatigue, and cognitive performance. Clinical trials support modest benefits for stress-related fatigue. It is generally well tolerated. Stimulating effects may cause insomnia or agitation in some individuals. It may interact with antidepressants via monoamine pathways.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Rhodiola rosea
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Stimulating effect may cause insomnia or irritability at high doses
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Stimulating effect may cause insomnia or irritability at high doses
Ingredient Rhodiola Rosea
Scientific name Rhodiola rosea
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Stimulating effect may cause insomnia or irritability at high doses
  • Possible interaction with antidepressants (MAOIs, SSRIs)
  • May lower blood pressure and blood sugar
  • Avoid in bipolar disorder -- may trigger manic episodes
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Rhodiola Rosea indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Rhodiola Rosea
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Rhodiola rosea
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 15 აპრ 2026, 19:53

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Adaptive Laboratory Evolution for Enhanced Tyrosol Tolerance Enables High-Titer Salidroside Production in Escherichia coli. ↗
    Journal ACS Synth Biol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li C et al.. Adaptive Laboratory Evolution for Enhanced Tyrosol Tolerance Enables High-Titer Salidroside Production in Escherichia coli.. ACS Synth Biol. 2026. PMID:41979105.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Salidroside ameliorates skin aging in male mice by promoting collagen regeneration via modulation of FOS and MMP9. ↗
    Journal Biogerontology
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang Z et al.. Salidroside ameliorates skin aging in male mice by promoting collagen regeneration via modulation of FOS and MMP9.. Biogerontology. 2026. PMID:41961336.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Salidroside Ameliorates Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Mice by Regulating the AKT/NF-κB/NLRP3-HAS2 Axis. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li JH et al.. Salidroside Ameliorates Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Mice by Regulating the AKT/NF-κB/NLRP3-HAS2 Axis.. Food Sci Nutr. 2026. PMID:41948383.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A Rhodiola-derived acidic glycopeptide maintains sleep homeostasis by regulating brain lipid metabolism in Drosophila. ↗
    Journal Phytomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Xu R et al.. A Rhodiola-derived acidic glycopeptide maintains sleep homeostasis by regulating brain lipid metabolism in Drosophila.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41931999.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phenolic Compounds and Elemental Composition of Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae) from Altai Mountains. ↗
    Journal Dokl Biol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zibareva LN et al.. Phenolic Compounds and Elemental Composition of Rhodiola rosea (Crassulaceae) from Altai Mountains.. Dokl Biol Sci. 2026. PMID:41912825.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Rhodiola rosea, Ginkgo biloba, and Ashwagandha as novel antidepressant supplements: converging monoaminergic, neurotrophic, anti-inflammatory, and brain health pathways in depressive disorders. ↗
    Journal Front Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li X et al.. Rhodiola rosea, Ginkgo biloba, and Ashwagandha as novel antidepressant supplements: converging monoaminergic, neurotrophic, anti-inflammatory, and brain health pathways in depressive disorders.. Front Nutr. 2026. PMID:41909050.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Clinical evidence for the adaptogenic effects of Withania somnifera and Rhodiola rosea - A systematic review with molecular interpretation of psychometric outcomes. ↗
    Journal Ann Agric Environ Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Łuszczak J et al.. Clinical evidence for the adaptogenic effects of Withania somnifera and Rhodiola rosea - A systematic review with molecular interpretation of psychometric outcomes.. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2026. PMID:41906501.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    System-Level, Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Selected Plant Adaptogens-A Review. ↗
    Journal Nutrients
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Such S et al.. System-Level, Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Selected Plant Adaptogens-A Review.. Nutrients. 2026. PMID:41901106.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effects of Rhodiola rosea on Physical and Decision-Making Performance in Football Players: A Randomised Controlled Trial. ↗
    Journal Nutrients
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Dou Y et al.. Effects of Rhodiola rosea on Physical and Decision-Making Performance in Football Players: A Randomised Controlled Trial.. Nutrients. 2026. PMID:41829897.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A "Qualitative-Pharmacological-Correlation-Molecular" Integrated Workflow Reveals HIF-1α-Relevant Anti-Hypoxia Metabolites in Rhodiola Species. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li Y et al.. A "Qualitative-Pharmacological-Correlation-Molecular" Integrated Workflow Reveals HIF-1α-Relevant Anti-Hypoxia Metabolites in Rhodiola Species.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41828434.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Rhodiola Rosea. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 3.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Rhodiola Rosea

GIRI Score 3.0 / 10

A score of 3.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.