ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Mineral

Potassium Iodide

Potassium iodide (KI)

Also known as: KI, potassium iodide, iodide supplement

MODERATE RISK 4.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 4.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Triggers hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism depending on thyroid status
  • Particularly dangerous in Hashimoto thyroiditis and nodular goitre
  • UL: 1,100 mcg/day -- exceeded by some iodine supplements
  • Interacts with thyroid medications and antithyroid drugs

Contraindications

  • Triggers hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism depending on thyroid status
  • Particularly dangerous in Hashimoto thyroiditis and nodular goitre
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Potassium iodide is the pharmaceutical form of iodine used to supplement thyroid function. At the doses used in supplements it supports thyroid hormone synthesis. However chronic excess triggers both hypothyroidism (Wolff-Chaikoff effect) and hyperthyroidism (Jod-Basedow), particularly dangerous in individuals with nodular thyroid disease or autoimmune thyroid conditions. The UL is 1,100 mcg per day.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Potassium iodide (KI)
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Mineral
Key Safety Concern Triggers hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism depending on thyroid status
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Mineral
Main Safety Concern Triggers hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism depending on thyroid status
Ingredient Potassium Iodide
Scientific name Potassium iodide (KI)
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Mineral
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Triggers hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism depending on thyroid status
  • Particularly dangerous in Hashimoto thyroiditis and nodular goitre
  • UL: 1,100 mcg/day -- exceeded by some iodine supplements
  • Interacts with thyroid medications and antithyroid drugs
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Potassium Iodide indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Potassium Iodide
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Potassium iodide (KI)
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 30 მარ 2026, 23:32

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Efficacy of Conservative Approaches on the Physio-Mechanical Properties of Caries Lesions Remineralized with Silver Diamine Fluoride. ↗
    Journal Oral Health Prev Dent
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Al-Angari SS et al.. Efficacy of Conservative Approaches on the Physio-Mechanical Properties of Caries Lesions Remineralized with Silver Diamine Fluoride.. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2026. PMID:41910230.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Repeated Sublethal Photodynamic Inactivation Does Not Increase Biofilm Formation or Induce Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. ↗
    Journal Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Qi Q et al.. Repeated Sublethal Photodynamic Inactivation Does Not Increase Biofilm Formation or Induce Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.. Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther. 2026. PMID:41864396.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effectiveness of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Masking Discoloration Caused by Silver Diamine Fluoride: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. ↗
    Journal Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mathur A et al.. Effectiveness of Tooth-colored Restorative Materials in Masking Discoloration Caused by Silver Diamine Fluoride: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2026. PMID:41800005.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Two Commercially Available Silver Diamine Fluoride Solutions in Primary Molars:… ↗
    Journal Int J Clin Pediatr Dent
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Baldawa H et al.. Comparative Evaluation of the Shear Bond Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement to Two Commercially Available Silver Diamine Fluoride Solutions in Primary Molars: An In Vitro Study.. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2026. PMID:41799999.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Iodide for the management of Graves' disease in pregnancy. ↗
    Journal Thyroid Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yoshihara A et al.. Iodide for the management of Graves' disease in pregnancy.. Thyroid Res. 2026. PMID:41742197.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Extracellular matrix-mimetic ink for 3D printing and minimally invasive delivery of shape-memory constructs. ↗
    Journal Mater Today Bio
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Tavakoli S et al.. Extracellular matrix-mimetic ink for 3D printing and minimally invasive delivery of shape-memory constructs.. Mater Today Bio. 2026. PMID:41624524.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Clinical features of neonatal Graves' disease revealed by twelve cases that require- antithyroid therapy. ↗
    Journal Clin Pediatr Endocrinol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Adachi E et al.. Clinical features of neonatal Graves' disease revealed by twelve cases that require- antithyroid therapy.. Clin Pediatr Endocrinol. 2026. PMID:41522420.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Pre-Treatment With Potassium Iodide and Higher Radioiodine Dose Are the Risk Factors of Mid-to-Late-Phase Transient Thyrotoxicosis Following Radioiodine Therapy for Graves' Disease… ↗
    Journal Clin Endocrinol (Oxf)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Matsuda E et al.. Pre-Treatment With Potassium Iodide and Higher Radioiodine Dose Are the Risk Factors of Mid-to-Late-Phase Transient Thyrotoxicosis Following Radioiodine Therapy for Graves' Disease in Japanese Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2026. PMID:41491627.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Biocompatibility and antimicrobial efficacy of iodine-supported titania nanotubes on 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V implants. ↗
    Journal PLoS One
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Taweekitikul P et al.. Biocompatibility and antimicrobial efficacy of iodine-supported titania nanotubes on 3D-printed Ti-6Al-4V implants.. PLoS One. 2025. PMID:41452929.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    How to discontinue potassium iodide in combined therapy with methimazole for initial treatment of Graves' disease. ↗
    Journal Endocr J
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Murakami T et al.. How to discontinue potassium iodide in combined therapy with methimazole for initial treatment of Graves' disease.. Endocr J. 2025. PMID:41443837.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 4.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 4.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Potassium Iodide. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 4.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
4.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Potassium Iodide

GIRI Score 4.5 / 10

A score of 4.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.