ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Probiotics

Pediococcus acidilactici

Pediococcus acidilactici

Also known as: Pediococcus acidilactici R1001, P. acidilactici

LOW RISK 1.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk.

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Pediococcus acidilactici is a lactic acid bacterium used as a probiotic for immune modulation and GI health. It has a good safety record. Some strains carry intrinsic vancomycin resistance (a chromosomal trait, not transferable); this is not considered a safety concern for supplemental use. Standard probiotic caution applies for immunocompromised individuals.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Pediococcus acidilactici
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Probiotics
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Probiotics
Ingredient Pediococcus acidilactici
Scientific name Pediococcus acidilactici
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Probiotics
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Pediococcus acidilactici indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Pediococcus acidilactici
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Pediococcus acidilactici
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:11

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Pediococcus acidilactici WSP-AZM23: Genomic Insights, In Vitro Probiotic Potential, and Computational Analysis for Biotherapeutic Applications. ↗
    Journal Biochem Genet
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Akmaliyah R et al.. Pediococcus acidilactici WSP-AZM23: Genomic Insights, In Vitro Probiotic Potential, and Computational Analysis for Biotherapeutic Applications.. Biochem Genet. 2026. PMID:41931223.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Host intestinal microbiota adaptive changes following Paranosema locustae infection and mechanism of chronic pathogenesis. ↗
    Journal J Insect Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang H et al.. Host intestinal microbiota adaptive changes following Paranosema locustae infection and mechanism of chronic pathogenesis.. J Insect Sci. 2026. PMID:41911519.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Enhanced flavor and biogenic amine safety of salt-reduced Doubanjiang through co-inoculated fermentation with Pediococcus acidilactici and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii. ↗
    Journal Food Res Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liao S et al.. Enhanced flavor and biogenic amine safety of salt-reduced Doubanjiang through co-inoculated fermentation with Pediococcus acidilactici and Zygosaccharomyces rouxii.. Food Res Int. 2026. PMID:41895950.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Feruloyl esterase-producing lactobacillus screening and its synergistic effect with homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on corn stover silage. ↗
    Journal Front Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang L et al.. Feruloyl esterase-producing lactobacillus screening and its synergistic effect with homolactic and heterolactic bacteria on corn stover silage.. Front Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41868373.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Cellulosic L-Lactic Acid Production by Engineered Na(+)-Tolerant Pediococcus acidilactici and Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis Purification for L-Lactide Synthesis. ↗
    Journal Biotechnol Bioeng
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li Z et al.. Cellulosic L-Lactic Acid Production by Engineered Na(+)-Tolerant Pediococcus acidilactici and Bipolar Membrane Electrodialysis Purification for L-Lactide Synthesis.. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2026. PMID:41863517.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Lactobacillus acidophilus combined with Pediococcus acidilactici ameliorates colitis. ↗
    Journal Front Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yu P et al.. Lactobacillus acidophilus combined with Pediococcus acidilactici ameliorates colitis.. Front Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41859447.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phytosynbiotic Containing Double-Layer Microencapsulated Pediococcus acidilactici V202 and Tiliacora triandra Leaf Extract Improve Growth Performance and Gut Health in Broiler Chickens. ↗
    Journal Animals (Basel)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Nopparatmaitree M et al.. Phytosynbiotic Containing Double-Layer Microencapsulated Pediococcus acidilactici V202 and Tiliacora triandra Leaf Extract Improve Growth Performance and Gut Health in Broiler Chickens.. Animals (Basel). 2026. PMID:41829053.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Bacteriocin-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits bacterial contamination in raw starch-to-ethanol fermentations. ↗
    Journal Bioresour Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Rossouw M et al.. Bacteriocin-producing Saccharomyces cerevisiae inhibits bacterial contamination in raw starch-to-ethanol fermentations.. Bioresour Technol. 2026. PMID:41819348.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Alginate alleviates hyperuricemia by modulating the Pediococcus acidilactici LW1-1-butyrate-NLRP3 inflammasome axis. ↗
    Journal Int J Biol Macromol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li Y et al.. Alginate alleviates hyperuricemia by modulating the Pediococcus acidilactici LW1-1-butyrate-NLRP3 inflammasome axis.. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41819315.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Co-fermentation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici induces non-thermal gel of tilapia surimi: Quantitative assessment of microbial contribution to gel improvement. ↗
    Journal Curr Res Food Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang C et al.. Co-fermentation of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici induces non-thermal gel of tilapia surimi: Quantitative assessment of microbial contribution to gel improvement.. Curr Res Food Sci. 2026. PMID:41799256.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 1.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 1.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Pediococcus acidilactici. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 1.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
1.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Pediococcus acidilactici

GIRI Score 1.5 / 10

A score of 1.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.