ოთხშაბათი, ივნისი 24, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

MPFF

Citrus aurantium

Also known as: Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction, Daflon, Diosmin-Hesperidin complex, Phlebotonics

LOW RISK 1.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk.

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

MPFF (Micronized Purified Flavonoid Fraction) is a pharmaceutical-grade citrus bioflavonoid complex containing approximately 90% diosmin and 10% hesperidin. It is the active principle of Daflon® 500 mg, a registered prescription drug in France and widely used in Europe for chronic venous insufficiency and hemorrhoidal disease. Its clinical safety is among the best documented of any vascular supplement: landmark RCTs (including Lancet 1994), Cochrane reviews, and decades of post-marketing surveillance show an excellent tolerability profile. Adverse effects are limited to mild, transient GI symptoms. No clinically relevant drug interactions have been identified. It is considered safe for use during pregnancy for hemorrhoidal disease in the second and third trimesters based on European clinical data.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Citrus aurantium
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient MPFF
Scientific name Citrus aurantium
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for MPFF indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient MPFF
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Citrus aurantium
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 16 ივნ 2026, 01:59

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Integrated morphological, pomological, biochemical, and ISSR-based assessment of genetic diversity in wild sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) genotypes from the Hassa district… ↗
    Journal Biol Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Tunu00e7 Y. Integrated morphological, pomological, biochemical, and ISSR-based assessment of genetic diversity in wild sour orange (Citrus aurantium L.) genotypes from the Hassa district of Hatay, Tu00fcrkiye.. Biol Res. 2026. PMID:42289725.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Citrus aurantium honey-mediated gut homeostasis and anti-inflammation via Thorl/Nprl2-TORC1 signaling: Network pharmacology and Drosophila validation. ↗
    Journal Animal Model Exp Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wan W et al.. Citrus aurantium honey-mediated gut homeostasis and anti-inflammation via Thorl/Nprl2-TORC1 signaling: Network pharmacology and Drosophila validation.. Animal Model Exp Med. 2026. PMID:42226584.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Integration of network pharmacology, deep learning, and molecular biology reveals the efficacy of Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl. blossom extract in… ↗
    Journal J Ethnopharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ni Q et al.. Integration of network pharmacology, deep learning, and molecular biology reveals the efficacy of Citrus aurantium L. var. amara Engl. blossom extract in ameliorating diabetic osteoporosis.. J Ethnopharmacol. 2026. PMID:42217588.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Radiation-induced in vivo biochemical disruptions, acetylcholinesterase inhibition and synergistic radiosensitivity of (60)Co-u03b3 radiation integrated with Citrus aurantium nanoemulsions against Sitophilus oryzae (L.)… ↗
    Journal Appl Radiat Isot
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Senevirathne WHKE et al.. Radiation-induced in vivo biochemical disruptions, acetylcholinesterase inhibition and synergistic radiosensitivity of (60)Co-u03b3 radiation integrated with Citrus aurantium nanoemulsions against Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst).. Appl Radiat Isot. 2026. PMID:42217440.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Composition analysis, QSAR, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and ADMET profiles of Citrus aurantium fruit essential oil compounds as inhibitors of NF-u03baB… ↗
    Journal Comput Biol Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ogunleye FA et al.. Composition analysis, QSAR, molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation and ADMET profiles of Citrus aurantium fruit essential oil compounds as inhibitors of NF-u03baB and MAPK in brain injury.. Comput Biol Chem. 2026. PMID:42208171.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Tangeretin, a bioactive polymethoxyflavone from immature Citrus aurantium L. fruit, ameliorates experimental colitis by targeting the macrophage u03b22 integrin Mac-1. ↗
    Journal J Ethnopharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhu J et al.. Tangeretin, a bioactive polymethoxyflavone from immature Citrus aurantium L. fruit, ameliorates experimental colitis by targeting the macrophage u03b22 integrin Mac-1.. J Ethnopharmacol. 2026. PMID:42202920.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Exogenous ascorbic acid enhances drought tolerance in sour orange through integrated physiological and antioxidant mechanisms. ↗
    Journal BMC Plant Biol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mijani Z et al.. Exogenous ascorbic acid enhances drought tolerance in sour orange through integrated physiological and antioxidant mechanisms.. BMC Plant Biol. 2026. PMID:42157095.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Unexplained Supraventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Injury After Bitter Orange Supplement Use in a Young Woman. ↗
    Journal JACC Case Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Plaitis A et al.. Unexplained Supraventricular Tachycardia and Myocardial Injury After Bitter Orange Supplement Use in a Young Woman.. JACC Case Rep. 2026. PMID:42132724.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of essential oils from Citrus limon, Citrus aurantium, and Citrus margarita against Musca domestica. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Elmaidomy AH et al.. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of essential oils from Citrus limon, Citrus aurantium, and Citrus margarita against Musca domestica.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:42010347.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential of Citrus Aurantium and Artemisia Annua Essential Oils Nanoemulsions. ↗
    Journal Arch Razi Inst
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mahmoud O et al.. The Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Potential of Citrus Aurantium and Artemisia Annua Essential Oils Nanoemulsions.. Arch Razi Inst. 2025. PMID:42058245.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 1.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 1.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for MPFF. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 1.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
1.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for MPFF

GIRI Score 1.5 / 10

A score of 1.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.