Maizinol
Crocus sativus
Also known as: Saffron extract, Affron, Safranal, Crocin extract
This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).
Safety Profile
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Interactions
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Evidence and Scientific Findings
Ingredient Overview
Maizinol is a branded saffron-derived extract used for mood, sleep, and eye health. Saffron extracts are generally safe at standardised low doses (28–30 mg/day). At high doses, saffron can cause uterine contractions, vomiting, and mucosal bleeding. It may have mild serotonergic activity and should be used cautiously with SSRIs and other serotonergic medications. Avoid in pregnancy.
Biological and Chemical Classification
- Scientific Name
- Crocus sativus
Mechanism of Action
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Pharmacokinetics
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Recommended Dosage
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index
Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
- Main clinical benefit observed: Nootropics
- Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
- No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
The available scientific evidence for Maizinol indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.
Total SETI Score
High risk| Evidence quality | 10/40 |
| Evidence consistency | 20/20 |
| Safety signals | 0/20 |
| Study recency | 10/10 |
| Evidence transparency | 10/10 |
Evidence Summary
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
- 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
- 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)
Evidence Policy
Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.
Last updated: 26 მარ 2026, 14:07
Evidence Distribution
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWCsa-miR160 targets transcriptional repressor CsARF18 and modulates auxin-mediated crocin biosynthesis in Crocus sativus L. ↗Xing B et al.. Csa-miR160 targets transcriptional repressor CsARF18 and modulates auxin-mediated crocin biosynthesis in Crocus sativus L.. Plant Physiol. 2026. PMID:41838799.PMID 41838799 ↗Journal Plant PhysiolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41838799/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWFrom Plains to Mountains: Results of Current and Future Climatic Suitability Analysis for Crocus sativus L. Cultivation in Italy. ↗Giupponi L et al.. From Plains to Mountains: Results of Current and Future Climatic Suitability Analysis for Crocus sativus L. Cultivation in Italy.. Plants (Basel). 2026. PMID:41829725.PMID 41829725 ↗Journal Plants (Basel)Year 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41829725/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWOrganic priming strategies enhance antioxidant defense and suppress corm rot in saffron: role of Trichoderma and walnut leaf powder. ↗Bashir T et al.. Organic priming strategies enhance antioxidant defense and suppress corm rot in saffron: role of Trichoderma and walnut leaf powder.. Protoplasma. 2026. PMID:41811465.PMID 41811465 ↗Journal ProtoplasmaYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41811465/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWDesign and optimisation of rapid quadruplex PCR technique to identify plant-derived adulterants in saffron. ↗Boudadi I et al.. Design and optimisation of rapid quadruplex PCR technique to identify plant-derived adulterants in saffron.. J Food Sci Technol. 2026. PMID:41788453.PMID 41788453 ↗Journal J Food Sci TechnolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41788453/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWCrocin Mitigates Glutamate Excitotoxicity and Tau Hyperphosphorylation by Modulating EAAT2 and Akt/Tau Pathway in a Scopolamine-induced Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease. ↗El-Baga SE et al.. Crocin Mitigates Glutamate Excitotoxicity and Tau Hyperphosphorylation by Modulating EAAT2 and Akt/Tau Pathway in a Scopolamine-induced Rat Model of Alzheimer's Disease.. Neurochem Res. 2026. PMID:41784832.PMID 41784832 ↗Journal Neurochem ResYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41784832/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWPromising synergistic interactions and mixture optimization of safranal, crocin, and crocetin from Moroccan Crocus sativus L. with enhanced antimicrobial activity. ↗Baraich A et al.. Promising synergistic interactions and mixture optimization of safranal, crocin, and crocetin from Moroccan Crocus sativus L. with enhanced antimicrobial activity.. Front Pharmacol. 2026. PMID:41769694.PMID 41769694 ↗Journal Front PharmacolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41769694/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWExploring the neurofunctional potential of saffron bioactives: from mood-related behavioral modulation to brain access of safranal. ↗Monchaux de Oliveira C et al.. Exploring the neurofunctional potential of saffron bioactives: from mood-related behavioral modulation to brain access of safranal.. Food Funct. 2026. PMID:41758529.PMID 41758529 ↗Journal Food FunctYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41758529/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWCrocin protects against smoke-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by regulating AKT1. ↗Zhu Y et al.. Crocin protects against smoke-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by regulating AKT1.. Front Pharmacol. 2026. PMID:41737560.PMID 41737560 ↗Journal Front PharmacolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41737560/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWField-deployable LAMP assay for rapid and specific detection of Fusarium oxysporum causing corm rot in saffron. ↗Tripathi V et al.. Field-deployable LAMP assay for rapid and specific detection of Fusarium oxysporum causing corm rot in saffron.. Talanta. 2026. PMID:41724110.PMID 41724110 ↗Journal TalantaYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41724110/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWMedicinal plants in the management of muscle loss and sarcopenia: A narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence from eight species. ↗Yazdanpanah Z et al.. Medicinal plants in the management of muscle loss and sarcopenia: A narrative review of preclinical and clinical evidence from eight species.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41720015.PMID 41720015 ↗Journal PhytomedicineYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41720015/
Score Transparency
0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.
Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies
Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.
Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals
Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.
One or more monitoring-level safety signals active
Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.
Final GIRI Score for Maizinol. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
Full methodology & data sources
The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.
- References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
- Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
- Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
- Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
Risk Level Classification
Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.
0–3.0
3.0–5.5
5.5–7.5
7.5–10
The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.
What drove the Low classification for Maizinol
A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
0 approved references.
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).
Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.
No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.
No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).
How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?
The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:
| Level | Score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | 0.0 – 2.9 | Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts. |
| MODERATE | 3.0 – 5.4 | Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups. |
| HIGH | 5.5 – 7.4 | Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended. |
| CRITICAL | 7.5 – 10 | Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision. |
Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.


