ორშაბათი, ივნისი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Lactobacillus Acidophilus

Lactobacillus acidophilus

Also known as: L. acidophilus, Lactobacillus acidophilus, acidophilus

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Bacteremia and systemic infection in immunocompromised individuals
  • NOT recommended for patients with central venous catheters
  • NOT recommended during severe intestinal illness or perforation
  • CFU count and viability at expiry varies greatly between products

Contraindications

  • Bacteremia and systemic infection in immunocompromised individuals
  • NOT recommended for patients with central venous catheters
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Lactobacillus acidophilus is one of the most studied probiotic strains with evidence for managing antibiotic-associated diarrhea, IBS symptoms, and vaginal health. Generally considered safe for healthy adults. NOT recommended for immunocompromised individuals, those with central venous catheters, or those with intestinal perforations due to risk of bacteremia and systemic infection. Product quality and CFU viability at expiry vary dramatically.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Lactobacillus acidophilus
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Bacteremia and systemic infection in immunocompromised individuals
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Bacteremia and systemic infection in immunocompromised individuals
Ingredient Lactobacillus Acidophilus
Scientific name Lactobacillus acidophilus
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Bacteremia and systemic infection in immunocompromised individuals
  • NOT recommended for patients with central venous catheters
  • NOT recommended during severe intestinal illness or perforation
  • CFU count and viability at expiry varies greatly between products
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Lactobacillus Acidophilus indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Lactobacillus Acidophilus
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Lactobacillus acidophilus
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 09:04

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Probiotic Outer Membrane-Encapsulated Antimicrobial Delivery System against Cariogenic Tristreptococcal Species Biofilms and Oral Caries. ↗
    Journal ACS Appl Mater Interfaces
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Guo R et al.. Probiotic Outer Membrane-Encapsulated Antimicrobial Delivery System against Cariogenic Tristreptococcal Species Biofilms and Oral Caries.. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2026. PMID:41870273.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of long COVID. ↗
    Journal Virol J
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Khalid K et al.. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of long COVID.. Virol J. 2026. PMID:41862909.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Lactobacillus acidophilus combined with Pediococcus acidilactici ameliorates colitis. ↗
    Journal Front Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yu P et al.. Lactobacillus acidophilus combined with Pediococcus acidilactici ameliorates colitis.. Front Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41859447.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Probiotic Supplementation as an Alternative to Antibiotics in Bovine Sperm Cryopreservation: Effects on Motility, Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis. ↗
    Journal Reprod Domest Anim
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    u00d6mu00fcr AD et al.. Probiotic Supplementation as an Alternative to Antibiotics in Bovine Sperm Cryopreservation: Effects on Motility, Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis.. Reprod Domest Anim. 2026. PMID:41853987.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Improvement of the quality and flavor profiles of persimmon vinegar by bioaugmented inoculation with Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Wickerhamomyces anomalus. ↗
    Journal Food Chem X
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wan N et al.. Improvement of the quality and flavor profiles of persimmon vinegar by bioaugmented inoculation with Lactobacillus acidophilus, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum and Wickerhamomyces anomalus.. Food Chem X. 2026. PMID:41853602.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Oxidative stability and growth-promoting effect for Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 of whey protein isolate/inulin Maillard conjugates-based nanoemulsion delivery system containing fish oil. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Anim Resour
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kim YW et al.. Oxidative stability and growth-promoting effect for Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 43121 of whey protein isolate/inulin Maillard conjugates-based nanoemulsion delivery system containing fish oil.. Food Sci Anim Resour. 2026. PMID:41848984.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Characterization of age-related changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome of Kunming dogs and their associations with police performance. ↗
    Journal Microbiome
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Xu L et al.. Characterization of age-related changes in the gut microbiome and metabolome of Kunming dogs and their associations with police performance.. Microbiome. 2026. PMID:41840712.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Synergistic metabolism between Veillonella ratti and Lactobacillus acidophilus and its inhibition of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in piglet. ↗
    Journal Arch Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zheng W et al.. Synergistic metabolism between Veillonella ratti and Lactobacillus acidophilus and its inhibition of enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli infection in piglet.. Arch Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41831043.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Correction: Tripterygium glycosides sensitizes cisplatin chemotherapeutic potency by modulating gut microbiota in epithelial ovarian cancer. ↗
    Journal Front Cell Infect Microbiol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhan X et al.. Correction: Tripterygium glycosides sensitizes cisplatin chemotherapeutic potency by modulating gut microbiota in epithelial ovarian cancer.. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2026. PMID:41822333.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Genome assessment of Lactobacillus acidophilus WG8, a putative probiotic strain isolated from Holstein-Friesian raw milk. ↗
    Journal Microbiol Resour Announc
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mani S et al.. Genome assessment of Lactobacillus acidophilus WG8, a putative probiotic strain isolated from Holstein-Friesian raw milk.. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2026. PMID:41817422.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Lactobacillus Acidophilus. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Lactobacillus Acidophilus

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.