ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

L-Theanine

N5-ethyl-L-glutamine

Also known as: L-theanine, theanine, Suntheanine, gamma-glutamylethylamide

LOW RISK 1.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 1.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • May potentiate sedative medications at high doses
  • Additive blood pressure lowering with antihypertensives
  • No established UL -- long-term very high dose data limited
  • Generally regarded as one of the safest supplement ingredients

Contraindications

  • May potentiate sedative medications at high doses
  • Additive blood pressure lowering with antihypertensives
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

L-theanine is an amino acid found almost exclusively in tea leaves. It has a well-established safety profile at doses of 100-400 mg/day. It promotes relaxation without sedation and is commonly combined with caffeine to smooth its stimulant effects. No adverse effects have been documented at standard doses. No established UL.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
N5-ethyl-L-glutamine
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern May potentiate sedative medications at high doses
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern May potentiate sedative medications at high doses
Ingredient L-Theanine
Scientific name N5-ethyl-L-glutamine
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • May potentiate sedative medications at high doses
  • Additive blood pressure lowering with antihypertensives
  • No established UL -- long-term very high dose data limited
  • Generally regarded as one of the safest supplement ingredients
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for L-Theanine indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient L-Theanine
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name N5-ethyl-L-glutamine
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 23 მარ 2026, 18:47

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Beneath the Surface: Root Metabolites Driving Shoot Agronomic Traits in Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis L.). ↗
    Journal J Agric Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Huang Y et al.. Beneath the Surface: Root Metabolites Driving Shoot Agronomic Traits in Tea Plant (Camellia sinensis L.).. J Agric Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41848094.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Clinical assessment of blood glucose responses to 300-mg dose of L-theanine, an amino acid unique to green tea, in a fixed-sequence, two-period… ↗
    Journal J Pharm Health Care Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yamaura S et al.. Clinical assessment of blood glucose responses to 300-mg dose of L-theanine, an amino acid unique to green tea, in a fixed-sequence, two-period trial.. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2026. PMID:41845544.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A microbial L-theanine-BCAT2 axis rewires host BCAA catabolism. ↗
    Journal Sci China Life Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Fang X et al.. A microbial L-theanine-BCAT2 axis rewires host BCAA catabolism.. Sci China Life Sci. 2026. PMID:41840166.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    New and emerging treatments for anxiety disorders. ↗
    Journal BMJ
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zbozinek TD et al.. New and emerging treatments for anxiety disorders.. BMJ. 2026. PMID:41839508.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Combined and Separate Pretreatments with L-Theanine and Aerobic Exercise Modulate Cognitive Decline Following Chronic Neuroinflammation in Rats Exposed to Lipopolysaccharide. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hadzhipetrov GK et al.. Combined and Separate Pretreatments with L-Theanine and Aerobic Exercise Modulate Cognitive Decline Following Chronic Neuroinflammation in Rats Exposed to Lipopolysaccharide.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41828356.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    L-theanine as a sustainable feed additive: Evaluating impacts on animal health and production efficiency. ↗
    Journal Microb Pathog
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wu S et al.. L-theanine as a sustainable feed additive: Evaluating impacts on animal health and production efficiency.. Microb Pathog. 2026. PMID:41802656.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Pharmacological effects and molecular targets of L-theanine in cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities. ↗
    Journal Eur J Pharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Garcu00eda-Niu00f1o WR et al.. Pharmacological effects and molecular targets of L-theanine in cardiovascular diseases and comorbidities.. Eur J Pharmacol. 2026. PMID:41796839.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Comparative evaluation of l-theanine synthetases coupled with PPK2 based ATP regeneration under buffer-free and Mn(2u202f+) optimized conditions. ↗
    Journal Enzyme Microb Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yu K et al.. Comparative evaluation of l-theanine synthetases coupled with PPK2 based ATP regeneration under buffer-free and Mn(2u202f+) optimized conditions.. Enzyme Microb Technol. 2026. PMID:41762940.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Antidepressant Mechanisms of L-Theanine in Tea Based on Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ↗
    Journal Foods
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Shi Y et al.. Antidepressant Mechanisms of L-Theanine in Tea Based on Network Pharmacology, Molecular Docking, and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.. Foods. 2026. PMID:41683141.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Kiperin Mind Focus supplement mitigates chronic stress-induced neuroinflammation and molecular dysregulation and improves stress-related affective and exploratory behaviors in rats. ↗
    Journal Front Integr Neurosci
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Karcioglu Batur L et al.. Kiperin Mind Focus supplement mitigates chronic stress-induced neuroinflammation and molecular dysregulation and improves stress-related affective and exploratory behaviors in rats.. Front Integr Neurosci. 2025. PMID:41695889.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 1.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 1.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for L-Theanine. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 1.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
1.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for L-Theanine

GIRI Score 1.5 / 10

A score of 1.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.