ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 16, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Metabolic

L-Proline

L-Proline

Also known as: proline, L-proline, hydroxyproline precursor

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Very limited human safety data for isolated supplementation
  • No established UL
  • Proline imino acid structure -- rare metabolic disorders involve proline metabolism
  • Generally considered safe

Contraindications

  • Very limited human safety data for isolated supplementation
  • No established UL
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

L-proline is a non-essential amino acid critical for collagen and connective tissue synthesis. Used in joint health and skin supplements. Well tolerated with very limited adverse event documentation. No established UL.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
L-Proline
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Metabolic
Key Safety Concern Very limited human safety data for isolated supplementation
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Metabolic
Main Safety Concern Very limited human safety data for isolated supplementation
Ingredient L-Proline
Scientific name L-Proline
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Metabolic
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Very limited human safety data for isolated supplementation
  • No established UL
  • Proline imino acid structure -- rare metabolic disorders involve proline metabolism
  • Generally considered safe
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for L-Proline indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient L-Proline
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name L-Proline
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 12:51

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Synergic Effect of Enzyme-Assisted Extraction and Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Bioactives Recovery in Orange Peel Waste. ↗
    Journal Biotechnol Appl Biochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gomez-Urios C et al.. Synergic Effect of Enzyme-Assisted Extraction and Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents for Bioactives Recovery in Orange Peel Waste.. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2026. PMID:41873141.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    One-pot multicomponent diastereoselective synthesis of indoline spirobicyclics using a recyclable chiral nanomagnetic L-proline catalyst under mild conditions. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Rafipour D et al.. One-pot multicomponent diastereoselective synthesis of indoline spirobicyclics using a recyclable chiral nanomagnetic L-proline catalyst under mild conditions.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41865026.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Determination of proline enantiomers in honey by FMOC-LC/FL and storage-associated changes in enantiomeric composition. ↗
    Journal J AOAC Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Saito K et al.. Determination of proline enantiomers in honey by FMOC-LC/FL and storage-associated changes in enantiomeric composition.. J AOAC Int. 2026. PMID:41844552.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Polymerization Chaperone for the Controlled, Homogeneous Synthesis of Proline-Based Homo- and Copolypeptides. ↗
    Journal J Am Chem Soc
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lu M et al.. Polymerization Chaperone for the Controlled, Homogeneous Synthesis of Proline-Based Homo- and Copolypeptides.. J Am Chem Soc. 2026. PMID:41834376.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Unveiling aggregation-induced emission in benzimidazole-acrylonitriles for fluorescence live-cell imaging in HeLa cells. ↗
    Journal J Mater Chem B
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chandrakanth M et al.. Unveiling aggregation-induced emission in benzimidazole-acrylonitriles for fluorescence live-cell imaging in HeLa cells.. J Mater Chem B. 2026. PMID:41823225.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A metabolomics approach to fingerprint the heat-induced alterations in milk and identify potential thermal biomarkers. ↗
    Journal Food Res Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Rahman A et al.. A metabolomics approach to fingerprint the heat-induced alterations in milk and identify potential thermal biomarkers.. Food Res Int. 2026. PMID:41819916.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Discovery of Pyrazolo[5,1-b]quinazoline Tethered 1,2,3-Triazole Analogs as Potential Antioxidant Agents: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and In Silico Insights. ↗
    Journal ChemMedChem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Patel RC et al.. Discovery of Pyrazolo[5,1-b]quinazoline Tethered 1,2,3-Triazole Analogs as Potential Antioxidant Agents: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation, and In Silico Insights.. ChemMedChem. 2026. PMID:41819483.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Green synthesis of 4,4'-diaminotriarylmethane derivatives using a recyclable magnetic acidic nano catalyst. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Karamifar S et al.. Green synthesis of 4,4'-diaminotriarylmethane derivatives using a recyclable magnetic acidic nano catalyst.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41803296.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Fluorescent Carbon Dots Constructing PVA@N, S-CDs Composite Film: A Next-Generation Food Packaging Material With Dual Functions of Chlortetracycline… ↗
    Journal Small
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liu Y et al.. Nitrogen and Sulfur Co-Doped Fluorescent Carbon Dots Constructing PVA@N, S-CDs Composite Film: A Next-Generation Food Packaging Material With Dual Functions of Chlortetracycline Detection and Ultraviolet Shielding.. Small. 2026. PMID:41797688.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Stereoselective Preparation of (4S)-1-Methyl-4-Propyl-L-Proline Commencing from (cis)-4-Hydroxy-L-Proline. ↗
    Journal Molbank
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mandal GH et al.. Stereoselective Preparation of (4S)-1-Methyl-4-Propyl-L-Proline Commencing from (cis)-4-Hydroxy-L-Proline.. Molbank. 2025. PMID:41798737.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for L-Proline. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for L-Proline

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.