ორშაბათი, აპრილი 13, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Kudzu

Pueraria lobata

Also known as: Kudzu root extract, Pueraria lobata extract, Pueraria montana, Kudzu isoflavones, Puerarin, Daidzin, Kudzu vine root

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Kudzu (Pueraria lobata) root extract is rich in isoflavones including puerarin, daidzin, and daidzein. It is used for cardiovascular support, alcohol craving reduction, and menopausal symptoms. Generally well tolerated at standard doses. Phytoestrogenic activity from isoflavones warrants caution in hormone-sensitive conditions (estrogen receptor-positive cancers, endometriosis, uterine fibroids) and with hormonal medications (OCP, HRT, tamoxifen). May lower blood glucose — monitor in diabetic patients. Rare hepatotoxicity cases have been reported; avoid in liver disease. Avoid in pregnancy.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Pueraria lobata
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient Kudzu
Scientific name Pueraria lobata
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Kudzu indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Kudzu
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Pueraria lobata
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:09

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Efficient adsorption of Cu(II) from wastewater via modified biochars from residues of Chinese herbal medicines Pueraria lobata and Leonurus japonicus and direct… ↗
    Journal J Environ Manage
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhong Z et al.. Efficient adsorption of Cu(II) from wastewater via modified biochars from residues of Chinese herbal medicines Pueraria lobata and Leonurus japonicus and direct reuses for electrode materials.. J Environ Manage. 2026. PMID:41916243.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Solvent-Dependent Chemical Profiles and Biological Activities of Pueraria lobata Root Extracts. ↗
    Journal Molecules
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lee JH et al.. Solvent-Dependent Chemical Profiles and Biological Activities of Pueraria lobata Root Extracts.. Molecules. 2026. PMID:41900064.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Band gap energy shift as a biophysical marker of Puerarin's neuroprotective role in epilepsy-induced demyelination. ↗
    Journal J R Soc Interface
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bano S et al.. Band gap energy shift as a biophysical marker of Puerarin's neuroprotective role in epilepsy-induced demyelination.. J R Soc Interface. 2026. PMID:41875977.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The structural characteristics, physicochemical properties, rheological behavior and anti-obesity effects of polysaccharides from Pueraria lobata: In-depth study focusing on the gut microbiota-hepatic… ↗
    Journal Food Res Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Niu H et al.. The structural characteristics, physicochemical properties, rheological behavior and anti-obesity effects of polysaccharides from Pueraria lobata: In-depth study focusing on the gut microbiota-hepatic FGF21 signaling.. Food Res Int. 2026. PMID:41819911.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    ReCQC: A Novel NMR Data Analysis Platform Leveraging (13)C NMR and HSQC Database Strategies for Natural Product Dereplication. ↗
    Journal Anal Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Dong T et al.. ReCQC: A Novel NMR Data Analysis Platform Leveraging (13)C NMR and HSQC Database Strategies for Natural Product Dereplication.. Anal Chem. 2026. PMID:41805333.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Puerarin Improves Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes by Regulating Gut Microbiota Homeostasis and Promoting Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis. ↗
    Journal Phytother Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Cheng L et al.. Puerarin Improves Glucose and Lipid Metabolism in Type 2 Diabetes by Regulating Gut Microbiota Homeostasis and Promoting Adipose Tissue Thermogenesis.. Phytother Res. 2026. PMID:41696817.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    De Novo Biosynthesis of Biochanin A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via Integrated Metabolic and Organelle Engineering. ↗
    Journal J Agric Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Tan X et al.. De Novo Biosynthesis of Biochanin A in Saccharomyces cerevisiae via Integrated Metabolic and Organelle Engineering.. J Agric Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41639015.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Herbal-derived puerarin-berberine cocrystal: Computational insights into mechanisms driving simultaneous enhanced solubility and bioavailability. ↗
    Journal Phytomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li L et al.. Herbal-derived puerarin-berberine cocrystal: Computational insights into mechanisms driving simultaneous enhanced solubility and bioavailability.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41619558.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Engineered Biomimetic Nanorobots Orchestrate Targeted Nose-to-Brain Delivery to Resolve Neuron-Glia Entanglement against Parkinson's Disease. ↗
    Journal Small
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Xu Y et al.. Engineered Biomimetic Nanorobots Orchestrate Targeted Nose-to-Brain Delivery to Resolve Neuron-Glia Entanglement against Parkinson's Disease.. Small. 2026. PMID:41607240.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Potassium-Solubilizing Bacteria Mediate Light-Potassium Synergy to Enable Native Pueraria lobata to Outcompete Invasive Mikania micrantha. ↗
    Journal Microb Ecol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ma Y et al.. Potassium-Solubilizing Bacteria Mediate Light-Potassium Synergy to Enable Native Pueraria lobata to Outcompete Invasive Mikania micrantha.. Microb Ecol. 2026. PMID:41575584.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Kudzu. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Kudzu

GIRI Score 3.5 / 10

A score of 3.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.