ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Hibiscus Flower Extract

Hibiscus sabdariffa

Also known as: Roselle extract, Hibiscus tea extract, Hibiscus sabdariffa calyces

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Hibiscus extract has demonstrated blood-pressure-lowering effects in several clinical trials. It is generally safe. This antihypertensive action can interact with pharmaceutical antihypertensives and diuretics. It may interfere with chloroquine absorption. Avoid in pregnancy. Potential oestrogen-modulating effects warrant caution in hormone-sensitive conditions.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Hibiscus sabdariffa
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient Hibiscus Flower Extract
Scientific name Hibiscus sabdariffa
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Hibiscus Flower Extract indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Hibiscus Flower Extract
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Hibiscus sabdariffa
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 26 მარ 2026, 14:13

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The Chronic Elevated Consumption of Hibiscus sabdariffa Linnaeus Results in Kidney Damage Associated with Excess H(2)S. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Manzano-Pech L et al.. The Chronic Elevated Consumption of Hibiscus sabdariffa Linnaeus Results in Kidney Damage Associated with Excess H(2)S.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41828415.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Exploring mechanisms of Hibiscus Sabdariffa in treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an integrated approach utilizing network pharmacology, 3D-pharmacophore and molecular docking. ↗
    Journal In Silico Pharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Nguyen CUP et al.. Exploring mechanisms of Hibiscus Sabdariffa in treating non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an integrated approach utilizing network pharmacology, 3D-pharmacophore and molecular docking.. In Silico Pharmacol. 2026. PMID:41767854.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Dehydrated Hibiscus sabdariffa Calyces as Anthocyanin-Rich Natural Colorants: Influence of Food-Grade Extraction and Syrup Formulation on Stability and Technological Performance. ↗
    Journal Foods
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Vargas MEC et al.. Dehydrated Hibiscus sabdariffa Calyces as Anthocyanin-Rich Natural Colorants: Influence of Food-Grade Extraction and Syrup Formulation on Stability and Technological Performance.. Foods. 2026. PMID:41750970.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Content of Medicinal Plants Extracted by Ethanol, Methanol, and Water. ↗
    Journal J Oleo Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    u00c7akmak Sancar B et al.. Evaluation of Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Content of Medicinal Plants Extracted by Ethanol, Methanol, and Water.. J Oleo Sci. 2026. PMID:41621929.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Preliminary formulation studies of water-soluble granules of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx. ↗
    Journal Pak J Pharm Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sule Yahaya Z et al.. Preliminary formulation studies of water-soluble granules of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx.. Pak J Pharm Sci. 2026. PMID:41620911.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx aqueous extract mitigates alcohol withdrawal-induced anxiety and oxidative stress in mice. ↗
    Journal Biochem Biophys Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kouu00e9mou NE et al.. Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx aqueous extract mitigates alcohol withdrawal-induced anxiety and oxidative stress in mice.. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2026. PMID:41550511.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Deep-eutectic solvent assisted extraction of Hibiscus sabdariffa anthocyanin for the synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol/carboxy methyl cellulose composite smart films. ↗
    Journal Int J Biol Macromol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Giribabu D et al.. Deep-eutectic solvent assisted extraction of Hibiscus sabdariffa anthocyanin for the synthesis of polyvinyl alcohol/carboxy methyl cellulose composite smart films.. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41448314.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Postbiotic metabolites present in the supernatants of Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus and Bacillus cereus promote the germination and growth of Hibiscus sabdariffa and Prosopis… ↗
    Journal Front Microbiol
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ruiz-Aymu00e1 G et al.. Postbiotic metabolites present in the supernatants of Lysinibacillus xylanilyticus and Bacillus cereus promote the germination and growth of Hibiscus sabdariffa and Prosopis juliflora.. Front Microbiol. 2025. PMID:41658001.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Effects of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx extract on IL-10, TNF-u03b1, and woven bone during orthodontic relapse. ↗
    Journal J Taibah Univ Med Sci
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Pakpahan EL et al.. Effects of Hibiscus sabdariffa calyx extract on IL-10, TNF-u03b1, and woven bone during orthodontic relapse.. J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2025. PMID:41541829.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Vegan Sesame Milk Ice Cream With Probiotic Bacteria (Lactobacillus casei) and Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Calyces Extract: Formulation, Characterization, and Stability. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Nutr
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Didar Z et al.. Vegan Sesame Milk Ice Cream With Probiotic Bacteria (Lactobacillus casei) and Hibiscus (Hibiscus sabdariffa) Calyces Extract: Formulation, Characterization, and Stability.. Food Sci Nutr. 2025. PMID:41458894.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Hibiscus Flower Extract. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Hibiscus Flower Extract

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.