ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Gotu Kola

Centella asiatica

Also known as: centella, Indian pennywort, brahmi (misnamed), tiger herb, TECA

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Hepatotoxicity -- rare but documented
  • Photosensitivity reactions
  • Additive sedation with CNS depressants
  • Contraindicated in pregnancy at high doses

Contraindications

  • Hepatotoxicity -- rare but documented
  • Photosensitivity reactions
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Gotu kola contains triterpenoid saponins used for venous insufficiency, wound healing, and cognitive function. Some hepatotoxicity cases reported. May cause photosensitivity. Additive sedation with CNS depressants.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Centella asiatica
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Hepatotoxicity -- rare but documented
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Hepatotoxicity -- rare but documented
Ingredient Gotu Kola
Scientific name Centella asiatica
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Hepatotoxicity -- rare but documented
  • Photosensitivity reactions
  • Additive sedation with CNS depressants
  • Contraindicated in pregnancy at high doses
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Gotu Kola indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Gotu Kola
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Centella asiatica
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 22:38

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Asiatic Acid Ameliorates Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcers in Rats Through Enhancement of TGF-u03b21. ↗
    Journal J Biochem Mol Toxicol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Alamoudi AJ et al.. Asiatic Acid Ameliorates Indomethacin-Induced Gastric Ulcers in Rats Through Enhancement of TGF-u03b21.. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2026. PMID:41873212.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Therapeutic potential of Asiaticoside in wound healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). ↗
    Journal Pharm Biol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li Q et al.. Therapeutic potential of Asiaticoside in wound healing after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).. Pharm Biol. 2026. PMID:41866921.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Optimizing photoperiod for growth and centellosides biosynthesis in Centella asiatica under vertical farming conditions. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yang GS et al.. Optimizing photoperiod for growth and centellosides biosynthesis in Centella asiatica under vertical farming conditions.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41866629.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Asiaticoside attenuates renal fibrosis by targeting STAT3 to restore Th17/Treg homeostasis. ↗
    Journal Phytomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Xie LJ et al.. Asiaticoside attenuates renal fibrosis by targeting STAT3 to restore Th17/Treg homeostasis.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41865690.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Anti-Obesity Activity of Giant Centella asiatica Lava Seawater Extract (GCA-LS-90) Through Regulation of Adipocyte Differentiation and Lipid Metabolism In Vitro. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lee S et al.. Anti-Obesity Activity of Giant Centella asiatica Lava Seawater Extract (GCA-LS-90) Through Regulation of Adipocyte Differentiation and Lipid Metabolism In Vitro.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41828505.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Understanding the metabolome of four stress-relieving and cognitive-enhancing medicinal plants: a comprehensive HR-LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis. ↗
    Journal Metabolomics
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Khan MN et al.. Understanding the metabolome of four stress-relieving and cognitive-enhancing medicinal plants: a comprehensive HR-LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis.. Metabolomics. 2026. PMID:41793600.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Centella asiatica, Daucus carota, and Brassica oleracea Extracts Protect Against Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy Through the Activation of the AKT/mTOR Pathway. ↗
    Journal J Med Food
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Jang E et al.. Centella asiatica, Daucus carota, and Brassica oleracea Extracts Protect Against Dexamethasone-Induced Muscle Atrophy Through the Activation of the AKT/mTOR Pathway.. J Med Food. 2026. PMID:41758244.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Review of neuroprotective potential of natural products against hypoxia-induced neuronal injury. ↗
    Journal Front Pharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang Y et al.. Review of neuroprotective potential of natural products against hypoxia-induced neuronal injury.. Front Pharmacol. 2026. PMID:41756238.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Medicinal Plants for Major Depressive Disorder. ↗
    Journal Brain Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bertollo AG et al.. Medicinal Plants for Major Depressive Disorder.. Brain Sci. 2026. PMID:41750223.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Correction: Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis identifies candidate genes involved in triterpenoid saponin biosynthesis in leaves of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban. ↗
    Journal Front Plant Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wan L et al.. Correction: Integrated metabolome and transcriptome analysis identifies candidate genes involved in triterpenoid saponin biosynthesis in leaves of Centella asiatica (L.) Urban.. Front Plant Sci. 2026. PMID:41710173.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Gotu Kola. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Gotu Kola

GIRI Score 3.5 / 10

A score of 3.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.