Safety Profile
Known Safety Concerns
- Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
- Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
- Adds to overall sugar/calorie intake
- Check total carbohydrate content if managing blood sugar
Contraindications
- Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
- Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
Interactions
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Evidence and Scientific Findings
Ingredient Overview
Glucose is a simple sugar used as a binder, filler and rapid energy source in supplements and gummies. At supplement quantities it contributes to total glycaemic load. Diabetics and those monitoring blood sugar should account for glucose content in supplement labels. High doses contribute to dental caries.
Biological and Chemical Classification
- Scientific Name
- D-Glucose (dextrose monohydrate)
Mechanism of Action
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Pharmacokinetics
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
Recommended Dosage
Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.
SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index
Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
- Main clinical benefit observed: Excipient
- Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
- Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
- Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
- Adds to overall sugar/calorie intake
- Check total carbohydrate content if managing blood sugar
The available scientific evidence for Glucose indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.
Total SETI Score
High risk| Evidence quality | 10/40 |
| Evidence consistency | 20/20 |
| Safety signals | 0/20 |
| Study recency | 10/10 |
| Evidence transparency | 10/10 |
Evidence Summary
- 10 studies reviewed
- 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
- 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
- 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)
Evidence Policy
Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.
Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 11:05
Evidence Distribution
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWImpaired glucose tolerance and fatty liver as predictive factors for biologic switching in patients with psoriatic arthritis. ↗Go K et al.. Impaired glucose tolerance and fatty liver as predictive factors for biologic switching in patients with psoriatic arthritis.. Eur J Dermatol. 2026. PMID:41872089.PMID 41872089 ↗Journal Eur J DermatolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41872089/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWNovel mechanisms of dietary folic acid in improving hepatopancreas health of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus): the perspectives of autophagy and DNA methylation. ↗Wang Y et al.. Novel mechanisms of dietary folic acid in improving hepatopancreas health of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus): the perspectives of autophagy and DNA methylation.. J Nutr Biochem. 2026. PMID:41871815.PMID 41871815 ↗Journal J Nutr BiochemYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871815/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWInhibition of voltage-dependent anion channel 1 aggregation protects pancreatic beta-cell mitochondria from glucose toxicity. ↗Yao C et al.. Inhibition of voltage-dependent anion channel 1 aggregation protects pancreatic beta-cell mitochondria from glucose toxicity.. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41871761.PMID 41871761 ↗Journal Int J Biol MacromolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871761/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWCitrate-enabled process intensification reinforces energy and redox metabolism for sustainable bioproduction using Corynebacterium glutamicum. ↗Park K et al.. Citrate-enabled process intensification reinforces energy and redox metabolism for sustainable bioproduction using Corynebacterium glutamicum.. Bioresour Technol. 2026. PMID:41871697.PMID 41871697 ↗Journal Bioresour TechnolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871697/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWA novel lactic acid bacterium, Sporolactobacillus sp. LBM15018, enhances the growth and caproate fermentation capacity of Caproicibacterium lactatifermentans through interspecies cross-feeding. ↗Zhang L et al.. A novel lactic acid bacterium, Sporolactobacillus sp. LBM15018, enhances the growth and caproate fermentation capacity of Caproicibacterium lactatifermentans through interspecies cross-feeding.. Bioresour Technol. 2026. PMID:41871695.PMID 41871695 ↗Journal Bioresour TechnolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871695/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWGenetic Selection for High Body Weight Reshapes Gastrointestinal Structure and Microbiota in Lueyang Black-Boned Chickens. ↗Zhang F et al.. Genetic Selection for High Body Weight Reshapes Gastrointestinal Structure and Microbiota in Lueyang Black-Boned Chickens.. J Anim Sci. 2026. PMID:41871607.PMID 41871607 ↗Journal J Anim SciYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871607/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWPancreas Size and Fat Content Increase during Pregnancy and Correlate with Glycemic Control. ↗Widen EM et al.. Pancreas Size and Fat Content Increase during Pregnancy and Correlate with Glycemic Control.. Am J Perinatol. 2026. PMID:41871597.PMID 41871597 ↗Journal Am J PerinatolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871597/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWNon-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea as the first manifestation of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in an elderly patient. ↗Sharudin MS et al.. Non-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea as the first manifestation of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in an elderly patient.. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2026. PMID:41871537.PMID 41871537 ↗Journal Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case RepYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871537/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWReal-World Follow-Up of People With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Mobile Diabetes App With Connected Glucose Meters Finds Improvements in Glycemia Are… ↗Grady M et al.. Real-World Follow-Up of People With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Mobile Diabetes App With Connected Glucose Meters Finds Improvements in Glycemia Are Durable Over 5 Years.. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2026. PMID:41871528.PMID 41871528 ↗Journal J Diabetes Sci TechnolYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871528/
-
Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOWSynergistic effects of high hydrostatic pressure and catechin on the physicochemical, structural, and digestive characteristics of whole chestnut powder. ↗Wang R et al.. Synergistic effects of high hydrostatic pressure and catechin on the physicochemical, structural, and digestive characteristics of whole chestnut powder.. Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41871499.PMID 41871499 ↗Journal Food ChemYear 2026Study type Observational / otherEvidence strength LOW evidencePubMed link https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41871499/
Score Transparency
0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.
Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies
Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.
Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals
Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.
One or more monitoring-level safety signals active
Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.
Final GIRI Score for Glucose. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
Full methodology & data sources
The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.
- References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
- Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
- Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
- Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
Risk Level Classification
Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.
0–3.0
3.0–5.5
5.5–7.5
7.5–10
The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.
What drove the Low classification for Glucose
A score of 2.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.
0 approved references.
Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).
Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.
No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.
No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).
How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?
The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:
| Level | Score | Meaning |
|---|---|---|
| LOW | 0.0 – 2.9 | Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts. |
| MODERATE | 3.0 – 5.4 | Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups. |
| HIGH | 5.5 – 7.4 | Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended. |
| CRITICAL | 7.5 – 10 | Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision. |
Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.


