ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Excipient

Glucose

D-Glucose (dextrose monohydrate)

Also known as: glucose, dextrose, blood sugar, D-glucose

LOW RISK 2.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
  • Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
  • Adds to overall sugar/calorie intake
  • Check total carbohydrate content if managing blood sugar

Contraindications

  • Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
  • Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Glucose is a simple sugar used as a binder, filler and rapid energy source in supplements and gummies. At supplement quantities it contributes to total glycaemic load. Diabetics and those monitoring blood sugar should account for glucose content in supplement labels. High doses contribute to dental caries.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
D-Glucose (dextrose monohydrate)
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Excipient
Key Safety Concern Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Excipient
Main Safety Concern Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
Ingredient Glucose
Scientific name D-Glucose (dextrose monohydrate)
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Excipient
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Raises blood glucose -- relevant for diabetics
  • Contributes to dental caries in gummy products
  • Adds to overall sugar/calorie intake
  • Check total carbohydrate content if managing blood sugar
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Glucose indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Glucose
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name D-Glucose (dextrose monohydrate)
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 11:05

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Impaired glucose tolerance and fatty liver as predictive factors for biologic switching in patients with psoriatic arthritis. ↗
    Journal Eur J Dermatol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Go K et al.. Impaired glucose tolerance and fatty liver as predictive factors for biologic switching in patients with psoriatic arthritis.. Eur J Dermatol. 2026. PMID:41872089.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Novel mechanisms of dietary folic acid in improving hepatopancreas health of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus): the perspectives of autophagy and DNA methylation. ↗
    Journal J Nutr Biochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang Y et al.. Novel mechanisms of dietary folic acid in improving hepatopancreas health of grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idellus): the perspectives of autophagy and DNA methylation.. J Nutr Biochem. 2026. PMID:41871815.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Inhibition of voltage-dependent anion channel 1 aggregation protects pancreatic beta-cell mitochondria from glucose toxicity. ↗
    Journal Int J Biol Macromol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yao C et al.. Inhibition of voltage-dependent anion channel 1 aggregation protects pancreatic beta-cell mitochondria from glucose toxicity.. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41871761.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Citrate-enabled process intensification reinforces energy and redox metabolism for sustainable bioproduction using Corynebacterium glutamicum. ↗
    Journal Bioresour Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Park K et al.. Citrate-enabled process intensification reinforces energy and redox metabolism for sustainable bioproduction using Corynebacterium glutamicum.. Bioresour Technol. 2026. PMID:41871697.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    A novel lactic acid bacterium, Sporolactobacillus sp. LBM15018, enhances the growth and caproate fermentation capacity of Caproicibacterium lactatifermentans through interspecies cross-feeding. ↗
    Journal Bioresour Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang L et al.. A novel lactic acid bacterium, Sporolactobacillus sp. LBM15018, enhances the growth and caproate fermentation capacity of Caproicibacterium lactatifermentans through interspecies cross-feeding.. Bioresour Technol. 2026. PMID:41871695.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Genetic Selection for High Body Weight Reshapes Gastrointestinal Structure and Microbiota in Lueyang Black-Boned Chickens. ↗
    Journal J Anim Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang F et al.. Genetic Selection for High Body Weight Reshapes Gastrointestinal Structure and Microbiota in Lueyang Black-Boned Chickens.. J Anim Sci. 2026. PMID:41871607.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Pancreas Size and Fat Content Increase during Pregnancy and Correlate with Glycemic Control. ↗
    Journal Am J Perinatol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Widen EM et al.. Pancreas Size and Fat Content Increase during Pregnancy and Correlate with Glycemic Control.. Am J Perinatol. 2026. PMID:41871597.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Non-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea as the first manifestation of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in an elderly patient. ↗
    Journal Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sharudin MS et al.. Non-ketotic hyperglycaemic hemichorea as the first manifestation of undiagnosed diabetes mellitus in an elderly patient.. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep. 2026. PMID:41871537.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Real-World Follow-Up of People With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Mobile Diabetes App With Connected Glucose Meters Finds Improvements in Glycemia Are… ↗
    Journal J Diabetes Sci Technol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Grady M et al.. Real-World Follow-Up of People With Type 2 Diabetes Using a Mobile Diabetes App With Connected Glucose Meters Finds Improvements in Glycemia Are Durable Over 5 Years.. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2026. PMID:41871528.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Synergistic effects of high hydrostatic pressure and catechin on the physicochemical, structural, and digestive characteristics of whole chestnut powder. ↗
    Journal Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang R et al.. Synergistic effects of high hydrostatic pressure and catechin on the physicochemical, structural, and digestive characteristics of whole chestnut powder.. Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41871499.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Glucose. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Glucose

GIRI Score 2.5 / 10

A score of 2.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.