ორშაბათი, აპრილი 13, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Sports Nutrition

Fava Bean Protein

Vicia faba

Also known as: Fava bean protein isolate, Broad bean protein, Vicia faba protein, Field bean protein, Faba bean protein isolate

MODERATE RISK 3.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • FAVISM RISK in G6PD deficiency (haemolytic anaemia — common in Mediterranean/Middle Eastern/African/Asian populations); legume allergen; L-DOPA trace content

Contraindications

  • FAVISM RISK in G6PD deficiency (haemolytic anaemia — common in Mediterranean/Middle Eastern/African/Asian populations); legume allergen; L-DOPA trace content
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Fava bean (Vicia faba, Fabaceae) protein isolate is an emerging plant-based protein ingredient used in vegan protein blends, commonly combined with pea and rice protein to improve amino acid completeness. Fava bean protein contains ~25–30% protein in the whole bean; isolates achieve 80–90% protein content. Amino acid profile is relatively complete with good lysine content (complementary to rice protein which is lysine-deficient) and moderate leucine. Digestibility (PDCAAS/DIAAS) is lower than whey but improving with processing technology. Generally well tolerated. CRITICAL SAFETY CONCERN: Fava beans naturally contain vicine and convicine (pyrimidine glycosides) — in individuals with G6PD deficiency (Glucose-6-Phosphate Dehydrogenase deficiency — an X-linked enzyme deficiency prevalent in Mediterranean, Middle Eastern, African, and Asian populations), fava bean consumption can trigger acute haemolytic anaemia (favism), a potentially life-threatening condition. Protein isolates may retain trace amounts of these compounds depending on processing. Individuals with known or suspected G6PD deficiency should avoid fava bean protein supplements. G6PD deficiency affects ~400 million people globally (WHO). Also contains low levels of L-DOPA (levodopa precursor) — theoretical interaction with MAOIs and Parkinson’s medications, though supplement doses are unlikely to be clinically significant. LEGUME allergen: cross-reactivity with peanut and other legumes possible. Avoid in legume/pea/lentil allergy.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Vicia faba
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Sports Nutrition
Key Safety Concern FAVISM RISK in G6PD deficiency (haemolytic anaemia — common in Mediterranean/Middle Eastern/African/Asian populations); legume allergen; L-DOPA trace content
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Sports Nutrition
Main Safety Concern FAVISM RISK in G6PD deficiency (haemolytic anaemia — common in Mediterranean/Middle Eastern/African/Asian populations); legume allergen; L-DOPA trace content
Ingredient Fava Bean Protein
Scientific name Vicia faba
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Sports Nutrition
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • FAVISM RISK in G6PD deficiency (haemolytic anaemia — common in Mediterranean/Middle Eastern/African/Asian populations); legume allergen; L-DOPA trace content
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Fava Bean Protein indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Fava Bean Protein
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Vicia faba
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:09

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Small sips, big losses: measuring the feeding threshold of Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on faba bean (Vicia faba) seeds. ↗
    Journal J Econ Entomol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Aguiar-Cordero T et al.. Small sips, big losses: measuring the feeding threshold of Lygus (Hemiptera: Miridae) on faba bean (Vicia faba) seeds.. J Econ Entomol. 2026. PMID:41921512.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Thyme Oil Alleviates Cadmium-Induced Disturbances in Mitotic Activity, Cytoskeletal Organization and H3T3/H3S10 Phosphorylation in Vicia faba. ↗
    Journal Int J Mol Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gocek-Szczurtek N et al.. Thyme Oil Alleviates Cadmium-Induced Disturbances in Mitotic Activity, Cytoskeletal Organization and H3T3/H3S10 Phosphorylation in Vicia faba.. Int J Mol Sci. 2026. PMID:41898658.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Compositional and microstructural changes in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) during soaking and boiling. ↗
    Journal Curr Res Food Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Fernandez Castaneda LA et al.. Compositional and microstructural changes in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) during soaking and boiling.. Curr Res Food Sci. 2026. PMID:41884578.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Extraction strategies integrated with digitalization processes for the characterization of proteins from broad bean and red beetroot waste leaves. ↗
    Journal Ultrason Sonochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Slavica A et al.. Extraction strategies integrated with digitalization processes for the characterization of proteins from broad bean and red beetroot waste leaves.. Ultrason Sonochem. 2026. PMID:41881884.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Contrasting roles of VfSBP transcription factors in regulating disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in faba bean. ↗
    Journal Plant Cell Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chen S et al.. Contrasting roles of VfSBP transcription factors in regulating disease resistance and abiotic stress tolerance in faba bean.. Plant Cell Rep. 2026. PMID:41876823.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Correction: Kinetic and isothermal insights on phenol removal via biochar from vicia Faba stems. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Barbari F et al.. Correction: Kinetic and isothermal insights on phenol removal via biochar from vicia Faba stems.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41872376.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Functional Potential of Peruvian Fava Bean Flours in Bread: Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Bioaccessibility. ↗
    Journal Plant Foods Hum Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Nicolau AAP et al.. Functional Potential of Peruvian Fava Bean Flours in Bread: Antioxidant Activity and Phenolic Bioaccessibility.. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2026. PMID:41865089.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Chemical profile of Vicia faba L. bee bread and its antioxidant properties. ↗
    Journal Nat Prod Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Abd El-Wahed AA et al.. Chemical profile of Vicia faba L. bee bread and its antioxidant properties.. Nat Prod Res. 2026. PMID:41849723.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Magnesium Leaf Application as a Rapid Tool for Salt Stress Resistance in Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.). ↗
    Journal Plants (Basel)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Parisa D et al.. Magnesium Leaf Application as a Rapid Tool for Salt Stress Resistance in Faba Beans (Vicia faba L.).. Plants (Basel). 2026. PMID:41829796.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Enhancing faba bean (Vicia faba L.) productivity and improving soil fertility using organic amendments in alkaline soil. ↗
    Journal BMC Plant Biol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gharib HS et al.. Enhancing faba bean (Vicia faba L.) productivity and improving soil fertility using organic amendments in alkaline soil.. BMC Plant Biol. 2026. PMID:41826844.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Fava Bean Protein. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 3.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Fava Bean Protein

GIRI Score 3.0 / 10

A score of 3.0 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.