ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 15, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Curcumin Phytosome

Curcuma longa

Also known as: Meriva, Phosphatidylcholine-curcumin complex, Bioavailable curcumin

LOW RISK 2.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Curcumin phytosome (e.g., Meriva) is a phosphatidylcholine complex that significantly increases curcumin bioavailability compared to standard turmeric extract. Its safety profile mirrors curcumin but with potentially greater systemic exposure. GI discomfort at high doses is the main side effect. The increased bioavailability may amplify interactions with CYP3A4-metabolised drugs including anticoagulants. Use with caution in patients on warfarin, chemotherapy, or immunosuppressants.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Curcuma longa
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient Curcumin Phytosome
Scientific name Curcuma longa
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Curcumin Phytosome indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Curcumin Phytosome
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Curcuma longa
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 26 მარ 2026, 14:07

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Optimization of the extraction of Curcuma longa L. oleoresin with supercritical CO2. ↗
    Journal An Acad Bras Cienc
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Barriga-Su00e1nchez M et al.. Optimization of the extraction of Curcuma longa L. oleoresin with supercritical CO2.. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2026. PMID:41880396.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Curcumin in Behu00e7et's disease: exploring therapeutic potential, evidence, and key research gaps. ↗
    Journal Inflammopharmacology
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Heidari Z et al.. Curcumin in Behu00e7et's disease: exploring therapeutic potential, evidence, and key research gaps.. Inflammopharmacology. 2026. PMID:41879901.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Curcumin Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Optimisation and Prospects of Anticancer Activity Against Primarily Female-Associated Cancers. ↗
    Journal Int J Nanomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ndongwe T et al.. Curcumin Nanocrystals: Synthesis, Optimisation and Prospects of Anticancer Activity Against Primarily Female-Associated Cancers.. Int J Nanomedicine. 2026. PMID:41878136.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Curcumin: A Multifunctional Molecule for the Detection of Various Adulterants, Pathogens, and Toxins in the Agro-Food Industry. ↗
    Journal Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gupta KK et al.. Curcumin: A Multifunctional Molecule for the Detection of Various Adulterants, Pathogens, and Toxins in the Agro-Food Industry.. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf. 2026. PMID:41877454.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    CHARMM Force Field for Curcuma longa Phytochemicals: Towards Reliable Modeling of Curcuminoids and Turmerones in Biological Systems. ↗
    Journal J Comput Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Archana et al.. CHARMM Force Field for Curcuma longa Phytochemicals: Towards Reliable Modeling of Curcuminoids and Turmerones in Biological Systems.. J Comput Chem. 2026. PMID:41858136.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Curcuma longa-derived extracellular vesicle-like particles ameliorate retinal neovascularization through HIF-1u03b1 and NRF2 signaling. ↗
    Journal J Nanobiotechnology
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chen Y et al.. Curcuma longa-derived extracellular vesicle-like particles ameliorate retinal neovascularization through HIF-1u03b1 and NRF2 signaling.. J Nanobiotechnology. 2026. PMID:41851718.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phytomedicines and conventional drugs in scabies management. ↗
    Journal GMS Hyg Infect Control
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hoque M. Phytomedicines and conventional drugs in scabies management.. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2026. PMID:41835968.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Integrated In silico and In vitro Screening of Phytoconstituents as Potential Inhibitors of New Delhi Metallo-u03b2-lactamase-1 (NDM-1). ↗
    Journal Curr Pharm Biotechnol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kumar A et al.. Integrated In silico and In vitro Screening of Phytoconstituents as Potential Inhibitors of New Delhi Metallo-u03b2-lactamase-1 (NDM-1).. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2026. PMID:41830576.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Stair-climbing resistance exercise, with or without oral turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) supplementation, relieves symptoms and promotes musculoskeletal repair in experimental rheumatoid arthritis… ↗
    Journal J Muscle Res Cell Motil
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kuhn MG et al.. Stair-climbing resistance exercise, with or without oral turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) supplementation, relieves symptoms and promotes musculoskeletal repair in experimental rheumatoid arthritis in rats.. J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2026. PMID:41824114.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Curcumin in oral health: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and delivery strategies. ↗
    Journal Front Pharmacol
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hu C et al.. Curcumin in oral health: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and delivery strategies.. Front Pharmacol. 2025. PMID:41846867.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Curcumin Phytosome. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Curcumin Phytosome

GIRI Score 2.5 / 10

A score of 2.5 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.