ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 30, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Mineral

Calcium Carbonate

Calcium carbonate (CaCO3)

Also known as: calcium carbonate, chalk, limestone calcium, carbonate of lime

MODERATE RISK 4.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 4.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Poor absorption without stomach acid -- avoid with PPIs, use citrate instead
  • Meta-analyses link supplement calcium (not food) to increased MI risk
  • Kidney stone risk in calcium stone formers
  • Constipation and bloating at high doses

Contraindications

  • Poor absorption without stomach acid -- avoid with PPIs, use citrate instead
  • Meta-analyses link supplement calcium (not food) to increased MI risk
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Calcium carbonate is the most common and cheapest form of calcium in supplements, providing 40% elemental calcium by weight. It requires stomach acid for dissolution and is poorly absorbed in people on proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or with low stomach acid. High calcium intake from supplements (not food) is associated in meta-analyses with increased cardiovascular event risk. Kidney stone risk is elevated in predisposed individuals.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Mineral
Key Safety Concern Poor absorption without stomach acid -- avoid with PPIs, use citrate instead
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Mineral
Main Safety Concern Poor absorption without stomach acid -- avoid with PPIs, use citrate instead
Ingredient Calcium Carbonate
Scientific name Calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Mineral
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Poor absorption without stomach acid -- avoid with PPIs, use citrate instead
  • Meta-analyses link supplement calcium (not food) to increased MI risk
  • Kidney stone risk in calcium stone formers
  • Constipation and bloating at high doses
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Calcium Carbonate indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Calcium Carbonate
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Calcium carbonate (CaCO3)
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 13 აპრ 2026, 22:02

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The analysis and control of scale accumulation for mixed layer injection of water for the Shuanghe oil area in Yanchang Oilfield. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Qi C et al.. The analysis and control of scale accumulation for mixed layer injection of water for the Shuanghe oil area in Yanchang Oilfield.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41957089.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    EPS-mediated mineralization drives granule densification and enhances denitratation-anammox coupling under alkaline conditions. ↗
    Journal Water Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Cao S et al.. EPS-mediated mineralization drives granule densification and enhances denitratation-anammox coupling under alkaline conditions.. Water Res. 2026. PMID:41950684.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Calcium sulphate-based soybean salting-out urease purification for enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation in road base stabilisation. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Lemboye K et al.. Calcium sulphate-based soybean salting-out urease purification for enzyme-induced carbonate precipitation in road base stabilisation.. Sci Rep. 2026. PMID:41927729.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Mechanical performance optimization of CaCOu2083-modified fly ash-based hybrid geopolymer concrete using Taguchi methodology. ↗
    Journal Environ Sci Pollut Res Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Shaik MA et al.. Mechanical performance optimization of CaCOu2083-modified fly ash-based hybrid geopolymer concrete using Taguchi methodology.. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2026. PMID:41913003.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Selective magnetic extraction of calcium-based food additives using polystyrene sulfonate-functionalized starch magnetic particles. ↗
    Journal Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Adra HJ et al.. Selective magnetic extraction of calcium-based food additives using polystyrene sulfonate-functionalized starch magnetic particles.. Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41880963.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Engineering porous vaterite CaCOu2083 nanostructures via alcohol-surfactant coordination in co-precipitation: A facile route to tunable drug-carrier platforms. ↗
    Journal Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kim SY et al.. Engineering porous vaterite CaCOu2083 nanostructures via alcohol-surfactant coordination in co-precipitation: A facile route to tunable drug-carrier platforms.. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2026. PMID:41795322.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Recognition of counterfeit identity documents using FTIR spectroscopy and machine learning approaches. ↗
    Journal Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Aparecida Buffoni de Campos Carneiro L. Recognition of counterfeit identity documents using FTIR spectroscopy and machine learning approaches.. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc. 2026. PMID:41723927.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Biohealing through biocalcification by urolytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 on marble surfaces. ↗
    Journal World J Microbiol Biotechnol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Bicer TD et al.. Biohealing through biocalcification by urolytic bacteria Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633 on marble surfaces.. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2026. PMID:41591659.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The relation between pulmonary functions and serum biomarkers of lung diseases among workers exposed to calcium carbonate. ↗
    Journal J Occup Environ Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mourad BH et al.. The relation between pulmonary functions and serum biomarkers of lung diseases among workers exposed to calcium carbonate.. J Occup Environ Med. 2026. PMID:41501976.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Influence of altitudinal zones on soil nutrient dynamics and fertility constraints in agricultural terrains of Yunnan, China. ↗
    Journal Sci Rep
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sun J et al.. Influence of altitudinal zones on soil nutrient dynamics and fertility constraints in agricultural terrains of Yunnan, China.. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID:41365942.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 4.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 4.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Calcium Carbonate. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 4.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
4.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Calcium Carbonate

GIRI Score 4.0 / 10

A score of 4.0 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.