ხუთშაბათი, აპრილი 16, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Bifidobacterium Bifidum

Bifidobacterium bifidum

Also known as: B. bifidum, Bifidobacterium bifidum

LOW RISK 2.0/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 2.0/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Same immunocompromised patient safety warnings as other probiotics
  • Viability at expiry varies significantly between products
  • Clinical evidence for specific health claims is variable
  • GI gas and bloating are common initial side effects

Contraindications

  • Same immunocompromised patient safety warnings as other probiotics
  • Viability at expiry varies significantly between products
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Bifidobacterium bifidum is a key probiotic species of the infant and adult gut microbiome. Used in supplements for digestive health, immune support, and IBS. Well tolerated in healthy adults. Same immunocompromised patient cautions apply as with all probiotics. The clinical evidence base for most specific health claims is modest.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Bifidobacterium bifidum
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Same immunocompromised patient safety warnings as other probiotics
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Same immunocompromised patient safety warnings as other probiotics
Ingredient Bifidobacterium Bifidum
Scientific name Bifidobacterium bifidum
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Same immunocompromised patient safety warnings as other probiotics
  • Viability at expiry varies significantly between products
  • Clinical evidence for specific health claims is variable
  • GI gas and bloating are common initial side effects
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Bifidobacterium Bifidum indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Bifidobacterium Bifidum
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Bifidobacterium bifidum
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 24 მარ 2026, 09:12

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Human Milk Oligosaccharide Synbiotic Alleviates Food Allergy in Mice by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Increasing Indole-3-lactic Acid Levels. ↗
    Journal J Agric Food Chem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chang S et al.. Human Milk Oligosaccharide Synbiotic Alleviates Food Allergy in Mice by Modulating Gut Microbiota and Increasing Indole-3-lactic Acid Levels.. J Agric Food Chem. 2026. PMID:41859771.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Impact of 1,2-u03b1-L-fucosidase on pig enteric methane production and growth performance. ↗
    Journal Anim Microbiome
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Georgaki D et al.. Impact of 1,2-u03b1-L-fucosidase on pig enteric methane production and growth performance.. Anim Microbiome. 2026. PMID:41857672.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Synbiotics regulate gut microbiota-derived indole-3-acetic acid production to modulate the intestinal barrier and improve antibiotic-associated diarrhea. ↗
    Journal J Dairy Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Shan Y et al.. Synbiotics regulate gut microbiota-derived indole-3-acetic acid production to modulate the intestinal barrier and improve antibiotic-associated diarrhea.. J Dairy Sci. 2026. PMID:41850377.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Bifidobacterium bifidum G9-1 and Quality of Life in Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. ↗
    Journal Digestion
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Misawa N et al.. Bifidobacterium bifidum G9-1 and Quality of Life in Chronic Constipation: A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.. Digestion. 2026. PMID:41843723.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    The effect of short-term consumption of Bifidobacterium bifidum on the gut microbiome of obese individuals. ↗
    Journal Exp Biol Med (Maywood)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Burakova I et al.. The effect of short-term consumption of Bifidobacterium bifidum on the gut microbiome of obese individuals.. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2026. PMID:41809656.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    ILA-producing bifidobacterium bifidum ameliorates chronic kidney disease via AHR signaling by modulating the gut-kidney axis. ↗
    Journal Food Res Int
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Hua Q et al.. ILA-producing bifidobacterium bifidum ameliorates chronic kidney disease via AHR signaling by modulating the gut-kidney axis.. Food Res Int. 2026. PMID:41794500.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Bioactive metabolite profiling in mixed-species probiotic yogurt. ↗
    Journal J Dairy Sci
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Marole TA et al.. Bioactive metabolite profiling in mixed-species probiotic yogurt.. J Dairy Sci. 2026. PMID:41780866.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Phytochemical Profiling and Characterization of Honeydew, Cantaloupe, and Galia Melon Peel Extracts for Potential Prebiotic Activities. ↗
    Journal Food Sci Nutr
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Sameed N et al.. Phytochemical Profiling and Characterization of Honeydew, Cantaloupe, and Galia Melon Peel Extracts for Potential Prebiotic Activities.. Food Sci Nutr. 2026. PMID:41767835.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Advocating gut-retina connection and microbiota mediated pathways in management of age-related macular degeneration: Preclinical to clinical perspective. ↗
    Journal Ageing Res Rev
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Waghmare PV et al.. Advocating gut-retina connection and microbiota mediated pathways in management of age-related macular degeneration: Preclinical to clinical perspective.. Ageing Res Rev. 2026. PMID:41759744.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Exploring the frontier of oral nanomedicine in colorectal cancer therapy: Folate-targeted 5FU-Nisin-Selenium conjugates and probiotic-rich diets as a novel approach. ↗
    Journal Asian J Pharm Sci
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Derakhshan-Sefidi M et al.. Exploring the frontier of oral nanomedicine in colorectal cancer therapy: Folate-targeted 5FU-Nisin-Selenium conjugates and probiotic-rich diets as a novel approach.. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2025. PMID:41809887.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 2.0 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 2.0 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Bifidobacterium Bifidum. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

LOW RISK 2.0/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a low safety concern under normal conditions of use.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
2.0

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Low classification for Bifidobacterium Bifidum

GIRI Score 2.0 / 10

A score of 2.0 places this ingredient in the Low band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.