შაბათი, მაისი 2, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Fumitory

Fumaria officinalis

Also known as: Fumitory herb, Fumaria officinalis extract, Earth smoke, Common fumitory

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 3.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Fumitory (Fumaria officinalis) is a traditional European herb with choleretic and hepatobiliary actions used for bile duct spasms, liver congestion, and eczema. It contains isoquinoline alkaloids (protopine, fumaricine). Generally used at low doses for short periods. At high doses, alkaloid content may cause bradycardia and hypotension. Not recommended in biliary obstruction. Contraindicated in pregnancy (uterotonic alkaloids). Long-term high-dose use not established as safe.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Fumaria officinalis
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 49/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 49/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Ingredient Fumitory
Scientific name Fumaria officinalis
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • No significant safety signals identified in the reviewed literature.
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Fumitory indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Fumitory
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Fumaria officinalis
49 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 9/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 06 აპრ 2026, 12:10

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Down-regulation of biofilm formation genes expression on some gram-negative bacteria by Fumaria officinalis extract. ↗
    Journal J Microbiol Methods
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Abdulsattar BO et al.. Down-regulation of biofilm formation genes expression on some gram-negative bacteria by Fumaria officinalis extract.. J Microbiol Methods. 2026. PMID:41871690.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Hierarchical Porous Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles with High Specific Surface Area by Green Synthesis. ↗
    Journal Micromachines (Basel)
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Khalugarova K et al.. Hierarchical Porous Nickel Oxide Nanoparticles with High Specific Surface Area by Green Synthesis.. Micromachines (Basel). 2026. PMID:41753814.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Plant-Derived Treatments for IBS: Clinical Outcomes, Mechanistic Insights, and Their Position in International Guidelines. ↗
    Journal Nutrients
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Pastras P et al.. Plant-Derived Treatments for IBS: Clinical Outcomes, Mechanistic Insights, and Their Position in International Guidelines.. Nutrients. 2026. PMID:41599795.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Fumaria officinalis: Phytochemical complexity and its medicinal significance. ↗
    Journal Fitoterapia
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Prokopenko Y et al.. Fumaria officinalis: Phytochemical complexity and its medicinal significance.. Fitoterapia. 2025. PMID:40763876.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Response Surface Methodology-Based Extraction of Fumaric Acid From Fumaria officinalis L. and Quantification by RP-HPLC. ↗
    Journal Biomed Chromatogr
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Mammadova G et al.. Response Surface Methodology-Based Extraction of Fumaric Acid From Fumaria officinalis L. and Quantification by RP-HPLC.. Biomed Chromatogr. 2025. PMID:40693429.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Anti-inflammatory potential of isoquinoline alkaloids from Fumaria officinalis: in vitro, in vivo, and in silico evaluation. ↗
    Journal J Comput Aided Mol Des
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yahiaoui S et al.. Anti-inflammatory potential of isoquinoline alkaloids from Fumaria officinalis: in vitro, in vivo, and in silico evaluation.. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2025. PMID:40650686.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Nano-Liposomal Carrier as Promising Dermal Delivery Platform for Fumaria officinalis L. Bioactives. ↗
    Journal Pharmaceutics
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ahmoda RA et al.. Nano-Liposomal Carrier as Promising Dermal Delivery Platform for Fumaria officinalis L. Bioactives.. Pharmaceutics. 2025. PMID:40574093.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    RETRACTION: The Pyrethroid Insecticide Permethrin Confers Hepatotoxicity Through DNA Damage and Mitochondria-Associated Apoptosis Induction in Rat: Palliative Benefits of Fumaria Officinalis. ↗
    Journal J Biochem Mol Toxicol
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    RETRACTION: The Pyrethroid Insecticide Permethrin Confers Hepatotoxicity Through DNA Damage and Mitochondria-Associated Apoptosis Induction in Rat: Palliative Benefits of Fumaria Officinalis.. J Biochem Mol Toxicol. 2025. PMID:40275771.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Whether pistil show diversity in bisymmetric and zygomorphic flowers in Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae): especially focus on stigma development, structure and secondary pollen presentation. ↗
    Journal Protoplasma
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Zhang MY et al.. Whether pistil show diversity in bisymmetric and zygomorphic flowers in Fumarioideae (Papaveraceae): especially focus on stigma development, structure and secondary pollen presentation.. Protoplasma. 2025. PMID:40227452.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Fumaria officinalis Dust as a Source of Bioactives for Potential Dermal Application: Optimization of Extraction Procedures, Phytochemical Profiling, and Effects Related to… ↗
    Journal Plants (Basel)
    Year 2025
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ahmoda RA et al.. Fumaria officinalis Dust as a Source of Bioactives for Potential Dermal Application: Optimization of Extraction Procedures, Phytochemical Profiling, and Effects Related to Skin Health Benefits.. Plants (Basel). 2025. PMID:39942914.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 3.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 3.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Fumitory. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 3.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
3.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Fumitory

GIRI Score 3.5 / 10

A score of 3.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.