ოთხშაბათი, აპრილი 29, 2026
- Advertisement -
Google search engine
Global Ingredient Risk Index Botanical

Dong Quai

Angelica sinensis

Also known as: female ginseng, dang gui, tang kuei, Chinese angelica root

MODERATE RISK 5.5/10 How?

This ingredient is classified as unclassified risk (GIRI score: 5.5/10).

02

Safety Profile

Known Safety Concerns

  • Warfarin potentiation -- documented drug interaction
  • Furanocoumarin-induced photosensitivity
  • Hormone-sensitive conditions -- contraindicated
  • Contraindicated in pregnancy

Contraindications

  • Warfarin potentiation -- documented drug interaction
  • Furanocoumarin-induced photosensitivity
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
03

Interactions

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
04

Evidence and Scientific Findings

Overview

Ingredient Overview

Dong Quai (Angelica sinensis) is widely used in Traditional Chinese Medicine for female reproductive health. Contains furanocoumarins with photosensitizing properties. Possesses anticoagulant properties that potentiate warfarin and other anticoagulants. Contains estrogen-like phytochemicals; contraindicated in hormone-sensitive cancers. Safety in pregnancy not established.

Classification

Biological and Chemical Classification

Scientific Name
Angelica sinensis
Mechanism

Mechanism of Action

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Clinical Evidence

Clinical Evidence of Effectiveness

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Pharmacokinetics

Pharmacokinetics

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

Dosage

Recommended Dosage

Information not yet available for this ingredient profile.

═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
05

SETI — Scientific Evidence Transparency Index

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Scientific Confidence Low
Evidence Strength Limited
Key Benefit Botanical
Key Safety Concern Warfarin potentiation -- documented drug interaction
Evidence Reviewed 10 PubMed studies
Scientific Confidence Low
Based on study quality, consistency, and recency

Executive Summary — Ingredient Assessment

SETI Score 50/100
Risk Level High risk
Evidence Strength Limited
Main Benefit Botanical
Main Safety Concern Warfarin potentiation -- documented drug interaction
Ingredient Dong Quai
Scientific name Angelica sinensis
Scientific Evidence Overview
  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or RCT)
  • Main clinical benefit observed: Botanical
  • Evidence consistency: High consistency across studies (100%)
Safety Signals
  • Warfarin potentiation -- documented drug interaction
  • Furanocoumarin-induced photosensitivity
  • Hormone-sensitive conditions -- contraindicated
  • Contraindicated in pregnancy
Evidence Strength Limited
Final Scientific Assessment

The available scientific evidence for Dong Quai indicates notable safety signals that warrant caution. Use should be considered carefully and monitored, particularly in sensitive populations or alongside other medications.

Ingredient Dong Quai
Evidence reviewed 10 peer-reviewed studies (last 10 years)
Scientific name Angelica sinensis
50 /100

Total SETI Score

High risk
Evidence quality 10/40
Evidence consistency 20/20
Safety signals 0/20
Study recency 10/10
Evidence transparency 10/10

Evidence Summary

  • 10 studies reviewed
  • 0 high-quality studies (meta-analysis or systematic review)
  • 0 studies identified benefits or no safety concern (GREEN)
  • 10 studies reported limited or advisory safety evidence (YELLOW)

Evidence Policy

Only peer-reviewed scientific literature indexed in PubMed or comparable databases is included in this evaluation. Commercial websites, blogs, and marketing materials are excluded. All references include direct traceable links to source documents.

Last updated: 25 მარ 2026, 22:28

Evidence Distribution

10 Other / unclassified
  1. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Senkyunolide H potentiates bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy for liver cirrhosis by targeting MAEA to enhance ERK-driven HGF secretion. ↗
    Journal Pharmacol Res
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liang Y et al.. Senkyunolide H potentiates bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells therapy for liver cirrhosis by targeting MAEA to enhance ERK-driven HGF secretion.. Pharmacol Res. 2026. PMID:41830881.
  2. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Structural characterization and in vitro antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of a water-soluble polysaccharide from Angelica sinensis (ASP-4). ↗
    Journal Int J Biol Macromol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Liu Y et al.. Structural characterization and in vitro antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities of a water-soluble polysaccharide from Angelica sinensis (ASP-4).. Int J Biol Macromol. 2026. PMID:41819329.
  3. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    [Angelica sinensis polysaccharide-chitosan nanosystem synergizes with radiotherapy to enhance anti-tumor immunity and suppress tumor growth]. ↗
    Journal Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Wang HJ et al.. [Angelica sinensis polysaccharide-chitosan nanosystem synergizes with radiotherapy to enhance anti-tumor immunity and suppress tumor growth].. Zhongguo Zhong Yao Za Zhi. 2026. PMID:41814818.
  4. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    First Report of Meloidogyne hapla (Nematoda) Parasitizing Angelica sinensis and Panax japonicus in Yunnan Province, China. ↗
    Journal Plant Dis
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Gu J et al.. First Report of Meloidogyne hapla (Nematoda) Parasitizing Angelica sinensis and Panax japonicus in Yunnan Province, China.. Plant Dis. 2026. PMID:41814778.
  5. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Concentrated Angelica sinensis pills ameliorate ovarian insufficiency by promoting vascular remodeling via inhibiting CYP1B1/ACSL4-mediated ferroptosis. ↗
    Journal Phytomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Ling C et al.. Concentrated Angelica sinensis pills ameliorate ovarian insufficiency by promoting vascular remodeling via inhibiting CYP1B1/ACSL4-mediated ferroptosis.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41795290.
  6. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Porous organic polymers with donor-acceptor architectures as efficient photocatalytic oxidase-like nanozyme for colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides. ↗
    Journal Mikrochim Acta
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Li S et al.. Porous organic polymers with donor-acceptor architectures as efficient photocatalytic oxidase-like nanozyme for colorimetric detection of organophosphorus pesticides.. Mikrochim Acta. 2026. PMID:41792480.
  7. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Mechanistic insights into the antidepressant effects of the Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong Herb Pair: Involvement of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. ↗
    Journal J Ethnopharmacol
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Yang TY et al.. Mechanistic insights into the antidepressant effects of the Angelica sinensis and Ligusticum chuanxiong Herb Pair: Involvement of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway.. J Ethnopharmacol. 2026. PMID:41780614.
  8. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Angelica sinensis polysaccharide nanoparticles can improve myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting ferritinophagy via the ATF6/NCOA4 pathway. ↗
    Journal J Transl Med
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Chen C et al.. Angelica sinensis polysaccharide nanoparticles can improve myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting ferritinophagy via the ATF6/NCOA4 pathway.. J Transl Med. 2026. PMID:41749209.
  9. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Hydroalcoholic gel of Angelica sinensis polysaccharides promotes wound healing by suppressing ferroptosis through PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 signaling pathway. ↗
    Journal Phytomedicine
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Pei J et al.. Hydroalcoholic gel of Angelica sinensis polysaccharides promotes wound healing by suppressing ferroptosis through PI3K/AKT/Nrf2 signaling pathway.. Phytomedicine. 2026. PMID:41724102.
  10. Observational / other LOW evidence YELLOW
    Guaiacol counters renal fibrosis via BMP/ERK/Smad1/5/9 signaling in UUO-induced chronic kidney disease. ↗
    Journal J Nutr Biochem
    Year 2026
    Study type Observational / other
    Evidence strength LOW evidence
    Kulkarni HV et al.. Guaiacol counters renal fibrosis via BMP/ERK/Smad1/5/9 signaling in UUO-induced chronic kidney disease.. J Nutr Biochem. 2026. PMID:41713711.
═══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════ -->
06

Score Transparency

Q × L × D × S × 10 = 5.5 / 10

The GIRI Score is the product of four independently computed evidence components, each normalised to 0–1, then scaled to 0–10. Every component is derived exclusively from peer-reviewed references and regulatory data — no editorial judgement is applied.

Q
Evidence Quantity 0 / 10
0%

0 of 10 approved references (score saturates at 10). More peer-reviewed studies = stronger evidence base.

Method: Q = number of approved references ÷ 10 (capped at 1.0)

L
Evidence Quality 5 / 10
50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies

Method: L = mean study-level weight across approved references. Level 1 (meta-analysis / systematic review) = 1.0; Level 2 (RCT) = 0.8; Level 3 (cohort/case-control) = 0.6; Level 4 (case report) = 0.4; Level 5 (animal / in-vitro) = 0.2.

D
Evidence Direction 5 / 10
Benefit
Risk
50%

Mixed or neutral — roughly equal benefit and risk signals

Method: D = (sum of risk-scored references − sum of benefit-scored references) ÷ total evidence score, then scaled from [−1, 1] to [0, 1]. 0.0 = pure benefit; 0.5 = neutral; 1.0 = pure risk.

S
Safety Signals 5 / 10
50%

One or more monitoring-level safety signals active

Method: S = 0.5 (neutral baseline) + sum of active signal severity deltas ÷ 10. Severity deltas: Critical = +2.0, High = +1.5, Moderate = +1.0, Low = +0.5. Capped at 1.0.

0Q × 5L × 5D × 5S = 5.5 / 10

Final GIRI Score for Dong Quai. Risk level thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Full methodology & data sources

The GIRI Score is computed entirely from structured data — no editorial scoring or subjective weighting is applied at any step.

  • References: Only approved references are counted. Each reference is assigned an evidence level (L1–L5) and a direction (risk / neutral / benefit) by the reference manager or AI classifier.
  • Safety Signals: Sourced from regulatory agencies (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others) and pharmacovigilance databases. Only active signals count toward the score.
  • Formula version: GIRI Score v3.7.0 — Q × L × D × S × 10.
  • Limitations: The score reflects published evidence and recorded signals as of the last update date. It is not a clinical risk assessment and should not replace advice from a qualified healthcare professional.
07

Risk Level Classification

MODERATE RISK 5.5/10

Based on available regulatory signals and scientific evidence, this ingredient presents a moderate safety concern. Caution is advised, particularly at high doses or in sensitive populations.

LOW
0–3.0
MODERATE
3.0–5.5
HIGH
5.5–7.5
CRITICAL
7.5–10
5.5

The score pin shows exactly where this ingredient falls on the fixed risk scale.

What drove the Moderate classification for Dong Quai

GIRI Score 5.5 / 10

A score of 5.5 places this ingredient in the Moderate band. Thresholds: Low 0–3.0 · Moderate 3.0–5.5 · High 5.5–7.5 · Critical 7.5–10.

Evidence Quantity (Q) 0 / 10 refs

0 approved references.

Evidence Quality (L) 50%

Limited — mostly case reports or animal studies (Level 4–5).

Evidence Direction (D) 50% toward risk

Neutral or mixed — benefit and risk signals roughly balanced.

Safety Signals (S) 0 active signals

No active signals — S component is at neutral baseline (0.5), contributing no extra risk weight.

Regulatory Status No restrictions found

No major regulatory restrictions or advisories recorded across monitored jurisdictions (FDA, EMA, Health Canada, TGA, and others).

How are the Low / Moderate / High / Critical thresholds defined?

The four risk levels are fixed score bands. A score is assigned to exactly one level based on where it falls:

LevelScoreMeaning
LOW0.0 – 2.9Sparse or predominantly beneficial evidence. No active safety alerts.
MODERATE3.0 – 5.4Mixed signals — some risk alongside benefit. Caution at high doses or in sensitive groups.
HIGH5.5 – 7.4Multiple studies or regulatory alerts documenting adverse effects. Professional oversight recommended.
CRITICAL7.5 – 10Regulatory restrictions in one or more major jurisdictions. Serious documented harm. Avoid without specialist supervision.

Thresholds are fixed constants (GIRI_Score_Utils::LEVEL_THRESHOLDS). They do not change per ingredient and are never subject to editorial adjustment.

შენიექიმი
sheniekimi.ge · PHIG
გამარჯობა 👋
სასურველი სერვისი აირჩიეთ ქვემოთ
⚡ გადაუდებელი შემთხვევა?
მყისიერი სამედიცინო დახმარება
📞 112
🩺
სიმპტომების შეფასება
150 კლინიკური სცენარი · WHO · AHA · NICE · 29 CDR
💉
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
WHO · ECDC · NCDC საქართველო 2025
💊
დანამატების შემოწმება
supplement.ge — 2,095 ინგრედიენტი
ℹ️ეს სისტემა ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. ყოველი გადაწყვეტილება დაფუძნებულია WHO, AHA, NICE, BTS სახელმძღვანელოებზე. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
პირადი ინფორმაცია
სიმპტომების ზუსტი შეფასებისთვის შეიყვანეთ ასაკი და სქესი
👤სავალდებულო
📏 ანთროპომეტრია
სიმაღლე · წონა · BMI — არასავალდებულო
🩺 სასიცოცხლო მაჩვენებლები
წნევა · პულსი · ტემპერატურა · SpO2 — არასავალდებულო
ნორმა: 90–129
ნორმა: 60–100
36–37.2
12–20
≥95%
სიმპტომების შეფასება
აირჩიეთ სცენარი სისტემის მიხედვით
🔍
კითხვა 1 / 1
📋 მტკიცებულებითი საფუძველი
World Health Organization (WHO) — IMAI სახელმძღვანელო
American Heart Association (AHA) / ACC
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE)
ICD-11 (2025) · World Health Organization
ეს ინსტრუმენტი ახდენს ტრიაჟს — არა დიაგნოზს. სიმპტომები შეიძლება მიუთითებდეს — ეს არ ნიშნავს, რომ დაავადება გაქვთ. ექიმის კონსულტაცია სავალდებულოა.
📰 სიახლეები ყველა ›
ვაქცინაციის კალენდარი
აირჩიეთ ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
WHO ECDC NCDC 2025
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
ასაკობრივი ჯგუფი
📚წყარო: NCDC საქართველო 17.09.2025 · WHO · ECDC
📰 ვაქცინაციის სიახლეები ყველა ›
დანამატების შემოწმება
გადადით supplement.ge-ზე და შეამოწმეთ ნებისმიერი პროდუქტი
SUPPLEMENT.GE
საქართველოს სასურსათო დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შემოწმების სისტემა
📊 2,095 ინგრედიენტი 📦 688 პროდუქტი
supplement.ge-ზე გადასვლა
ახალი ფანჯარა გაიხსნება
რას შეგიძლიათ შეამოწმოთ
🔬
ინგრედიენტის შემოწმება
NIH · EU · FDA · Health Canada მონაცემები
📷
ეტიკეტის სკანირება
AI ამოიცნობს ყველა ინგრედიენტს ფოტოდან
🌍
ქვეყნის მიხედვით სტატუსი
რეგულაცია 14 ქვეყანაში — აშშ, ევროკავშირი, კანადა
⚠️
წამალთან ინტერაქცია
აუცილებელი გაფრთხილებები მიმდინარე მკურნალობისას
✅ supplement.ge — საქართველოში ერთადერთი სრული სისტემა დანამატების უსაფრთხოების შესაფასებლად, PHIG-ის (საზოგადოებრივი ჯანდაცვის ინსტიტუტის) კონტროლით.